xbaywarrior wrote:sfsfsfgiants wrote:xbaywarrior wrote:sfsfsfgiants wrote:xbaywarrior wrote:sfsfsfgiants wrote:xbaywarrior wrote:And hey, the Warriors Big 3 are scoring a bit more than the Celtics Big 3.
Xbay, man, I started this whole thing.... you copied my idea!sfsfsfgiants wrote:I just want to bring up one point about the Celtics' big three: For those who are on the Celtics' bandwagon: the Warriors big three (Monta, Jackson, and Davis) average more points than the Celtics (Allen, Pierce, Garnett).
Ah yes, but I provided the evidence. I'll give you the nod for the topic, but I proved it. So therefore, I win.
I saw the exact same article you did. Nobody cares about the stats, they care about concepts. Therefore, I win.
Ah yes, but when you're outscoring an team of three being paid more and a higher rep, stats do come in. Thus, I am the winner.
But you wouldnt have even said anything had I not resurected this thread to say the stat in the first place. So.......... I win.
You're starting to sound like my girlfriend.
That is kind of awkward....