


Moderators: Mr. Crackerz, JREED, Guybrush, 32
migya wrote:JayPat wrote:Yeah, but they have Garnett.
The Celts big three are superstars, our are not but sometimes play like it
32 wrote:The difference between the Warriors is that you could subtract both "Big 3's" from the equation and the Warriors would stomp Boston out. Take away Garnett, Pierce, and Allen... and then take away Baron, Jackson, and Ellis... and we still have Harrington, Biedrins, and Barnes, not to mention youngsters like Wright and O'Bryant.
xbaywarrior wrote:And hey, the Warriors Big 3 are scoring a bit more than the Celtics Big 3.
Baron Davis - 23.3
Monta Ellis - 16.4
Stephen Jackson - 21.4
Kevin Garnett - 19.4
Paul Pierce - 20.1
Ray Allen - 21.1
Add that up, the Warriors Big 3, or better yet Little 3 are combining up to 61.1 while the Celtics Big 3 combines up to 60.6 a game.
They're similar in scoring yet those three are worth nearly over 75% of the Celtics salary. Not comparing the players, just saying if you could get that scoring for the price of around 30$ mil against around 55$ mil, wouldn't you be happy?
xbaywarrior wrote:And hey, the Warriors Big 3 are scoring a bit more than the Celtics Big 3.
sfsfsfgiants wrote:I just want to bring up one point about the Celtics' big three: For those who are on the Celtics' bandwagon: the Warriors big three (Monta, Jackson, and Davis) average more points than the Celtics (Allen, Pierce, Garnett).
sfsfsfgiants wrote:xbaywarrior wrote:And hey, the Warriors Big 3 are scoring a bit more than the Celtics Big 3.
Xbay, man, I started this whole thing.... you copied my idea!sfsfsfgiants wrote:I just want to bring up one point about the Celtics' big three: For those who are on the Celtics' bandwagon: the Warriors big three (Monta, Jackson, and Davis) average more points than the Celtics (Allen, Pierce, Garnett).
xbaywarrior wrote:sfsfsfgiants wrote:xbaywarrior wrote:And hey, the Warriors Big 3 are scoring a bit more than the Celtics Big 3.
Xbay, man, I started this whole thing.... you copied my idea!sfsfsfgiants wrote:I just want to bring up one point about the Celtics' big three: For those who are on the Celtics' bandwagon: the Warriors big three (Monta, Jackson, and Davis) average more points than the Celtics (Allen, Pierce, Garnett).
Ah yes, but I provided the evidence. I'll give you the nod for the topic, but I proved it. So therefore, I win.
sfsfsfgiants wrote:xbaywarrior wrote:sfsfsfgiants wrote:xbaywarrior wrote:And hey, the Warriors Big 3 are scoring a bit more than the Celtics Big 3.
Xbay, man, I started this whole thing.... you copied my idea!sfsfsfgiants wrote:I just want to bring up one point about the Celtics' big three: For those who are on the Celtics' bandwagon: the Warriors big three (Monta, Jackson, and Davis) average more points than the Celtics (Allen, Pierce, Garnett).
Ah yes, but I provided the evidence. I'll give you the nod for the topic, but I proved it. So therefore, I win.
I saw the exact same article you did. Nobody cares about the stats, they care about concepts. Therefore, I win.
xbaywarrior wrote:sfsfsfgiants wrote:xbaywarrior wrote:sfsfsfgiants wrote:xbaywarrior wrote:And hey, the Warriors Big 3 are scoring a bit more than the Celtics Big 3.
Xbay, man, I started this whole thing.... you copied my idea!sfsfsfgiants wrote:I just want to bring up one point about the Celtics' big three: For those who are on the Celtics' bandwagon: the Warriors big three (Monta, Jackson, and Davis) average more points than the Celtics (Allen, Pierce, Garnett).
Ah yes, but I provided the evidence. I'll give you the nod for the topic, but I proved it. So therefore, I win.
I saw the exact same article you did. Nobody cares about the stats, they care about concepts. Therefore, I win.
Ah yes, but when you're outscoring an team of three being paid more and a higher rep, stats do come in. Thus, I am the winner.
sfsfsfgiants wrote:xbaywarrior wrote:sfsfsfgiants wrote:xbaywarrior wrote:sfsfsfgiants wrote:xbaywarrior wrote:And hey, the Warriors Big 3 are scoring a bit more than the Celtics Big 3.
Xbay, man, I started this whole thing.... you copied my idea!sfsfsfgiants wrote:I just want to bring up one point about the Celtics' big three: For those who are on the Celtics' bandwagon: the Warriors big three (Monta, Jackson, and Davis) average more points than the Celtics (Allen, Pierce, Garnett).
Ah yes, but I provided the evidence. I'll give you the nod for the topic, but I proved it. So therefore, I win.
I saw the exact same article you did. Nobody cares about the stats, they care about concepts. Therefore, I win.
Ah yes, but when you're outscoring an team of three being paid more and a higher rep, stats do come in. Thus, I am the winner.
But you wouldnt have even said anything had I not resurected this thread to say the stat in the first place. So.......... I win.