The Real Newman wrote:I am being very polite, dont test me 32
Or what??? You'll go all cyber-tough-guy on me, like tradedunleavy?? I'm being just as polite as you are, don't trip out.
The Real Newman wrote:everybody here knows that u defended his contract(did not happen in january), u defended his play(the whole freaking 2005 season) and u defended him at evey moment. And just because I dont have time to go through your posts, doesnt mean u have proved anything.
Wrong; I did not defend his play in 2005. I would give the man credit when he played well (see January 2005) and not partake in the circle-jerk of hate threads after his horrendous games. Not wanting to waste my breath bitching and moaning about some guy isn't exactly 'defending him' in my book. Had you read my "Warriors Report Card" thread, you'd have seen that Mike Dunleavy got the only "F" on the entire roster. But, I understand you're a busy guy and "dont have the time to go through my posts". Just letting you in on what I actually said about Mike so you'll be informed next time.
Also, the only time you heard me defend Mike's contract was immediately after he inked the deal. If you recall his preseason a year ago, it was very impressive. Even though I understand that preseason doesn't mean sh*t, I got fooled by Mike's "I'm-working-out-and-getting-better-in-the-offseason" BS. Dunleavy pulled one over and me and I admitted my mistake in a past post. Whoopie. I made a mistake and admitted it.
I still don't believe Derek Fisher was a bad player for us last year, I still think Chris Mullin deserves another 2 seasons (counting this one) to show us what he's got, and I still think Murphy is the hardest worker on the roster. I understand that I belong to a minority when I say that, but its the truth.
Mike Dunleavy, though? You clearly got me mistaken for somebody else.