Game Thread: Seattle Supersonics @ Warriors 2006-11-18

Talk about the upcoming Warriors game here

Moderators: Mr. Crackerz, JREED, Guybrush, 32

Can the Warriors winning streak go to five?

Poll ended at Mon Nov 20, 2006 12:14 am

100%
YES
13
No votes
NO

Total votes: 13

User avatar

Role Player
Posts: 384
» Sat Nov 18, 2006 10:27 pm
Did Davis injure himself? NBA.com says he has only played 12 minutes, and there are two minutes left in the third. I hope he was just ejected from the game or something else.
User avatar

All Star
Posts: 1266
» Sat Nov 18, 2006 10:28 pm
Yeah, I've been worried about this too. Yahoo has him stuck at 17 minutes. I wish the friggin' game was on TV.
User avatar

Role Player
Posts: 376
» Sat Nov 18, 2006 10:30 pm
Hoonyo wrote:Did Davis injure himself? NBA.com says he has only played 12 minutes, and there are two minutes left in the third. I hope he was just ejected from the game or something else.


Exactly what I want to know....... [-o<
User avatar

Role Player
Posts: 357
» Sat Nov 18, 2006 10:32 pm
He's got bruised ribs or something like that. He's not coming back tonight.
User avatar

Role Player
Posts: 452
» Sat Nov 18, 2006 10:34 pm
damn i hope its not serious.
User avatar

Role Player
Posts: 376
» Sat Nov 18, 2006 10:44 pm
kfresh wrote:damn i hope its not serious.


Me too.....
Uh oh.....but they seem to be holding up pretty well.
User avatar

Starting Lineup
Posts: 661
» Sat Nov 18, 2006 10:49 pm
jeez, is ellis a god or what? 31 points. this is kid should be an all star this is year man... i love em..heres the box...107-95...go w's...

http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/boxscore?gameId=261118009
User avatar

Role Player
Posts: 376
» Sat Nov 18, 2006 11:02 pm
Damn, Monta is a real special player..... :D
31-7-7? That's.....ridiculous for a sophmore.....
These Warriors are for real man, 5 in a row!

Go Warriors!
User avatar

Role Player
Posts: 384
» Sat Nov 18, 2006 11:28 pm
Monta = Most Improved Player candidate and probable winner.
User avatar

Role Player
Posts: 452
» Sat Nov 18, 2006 11:45 pm
Hoonyo wrote:Monta = Most Improved Player candidate and probable winner.


Its between him and Kevin Martin.

BUT GO MONTA
User avatar

All Star
Posts: 3040
» Sun Nov 19, 2006 12:23 am
kfresh wrote:
Hoonyo wrote:Monta = Most Improved Player candidate and probable winner.


Its between him and Kevin Martin.

BUT GO MONTA

yup - hey, kfresh: you might want to add monta to your best backcourt signature...it's been BD, Monta and JRich (and Pietrus) getting this run on
User avatar

Moderator
Posts: 13751
» Sun Nov 19, 2006 1:18 am
TMC, if this doesn't confirm the SuperSonics are crap, I don't know what does.

Ray Allen's game-leading 34 points (with 11 boards) couldn't pull Seattle past the Murphy-less, Diogu-less, Baron-less (for the majority of the game) Warriors.

The Warriors even OUT-REBOUNDED them. Thats pretty much a dead give away when you suck; if Golden State gets more rebounds than you do.

The Sonics even made Mike Dunleavy look like the all-around player we know he's not; he collected 13 points, 9 rebounds, 7 assists, 3 steals, 1 block, and only commited 1 turnover.

The Sonics Big 3 played (pretty much) the best game they're capable of playing. Ray Allen had 30 points, 'Shard had 20, Luke had 15... and they STILL couldn't beat us.

Still think Seattle's a sleeper...? :wink:
User avatar

Hall of Famer
Posts: 18315
» Sun Nov 19, 2006 4:13 am
#32 wrote:TMC, if this doesn't confirm the SuperSonics are crap, I don't know what does.


Hey, they played us closer than the Pistons. According to that logic, the Pistons are even worse than the Sonics.

And keep in mind that our last three rivals played us in the second of back-to-back games. We've been lucky with the schedule so far. Games would have been closer if not.
User avatar

Starting Lineup
Posts: 879
» Sun Nov 19, 2006 11:09 am
#32 wrote:The Sonics even made Mike Dunleavy look like the all-around player we know he's not; he collected 13 points, 9 rebounds, 7 assists, 3 steals, 1 block, and only commited 1 turnover.


Oh good lord what kind of bazarro word have I land in, where #32 isn't praising dunleavy's 13 point games.
User avatar

Moderator
Posts: 13751
» Sun Nov 19, 2006 6:02 pm
Newman, if you would have simply paid attention and read my comments last time, you'd have seen how dead wrong you are. The only time I defended Mike Dunleavy's play was in January 2006, where the man averaged like 15 points, 7 rebounds, and 5 assists a game. You can't tell me those are horrible numbers. :roll:

Besides, if you REALLY think I'm a Dun-lover, why don't you go old-school and check out my very first post on this forum:

http://www.goldenstwarriors.com/viewtop ... ight=#8649

Reading is essential to understanding.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests