Moderators: Mr. Crackerz, JREED, Guybrush, hobbes
 Hall of Famer
Posts: 18461
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:48 am Location: Somewhere in this site... Poster Credit: -4 |
 Posted: Sun Sep 24, 2006 1:38 am
Yeah, I do, too. A pretty stupid contract for a role player... I'd love him for 3 million less per year. |
 Hall of Famer
Posts: 21500
Joined: Thu Jul 21, 2005 7:50 am Location: Perth Poster Credit: 28 |
Posted: Sun Sep 24, 2006 6:29 am
I reckon his contract was what other teams would have given him. Look at it - he was a starter on a 3 straight championships team, he has hit clutch shots and has almost ten years of experience; that will get you 6-8 million a year!   migya make the ring fall on ya |
Hall of Famer
Posts: 18461
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:48 am Location: Somewhere in this site... Poster Credit: -4 |
Posted: Sun Sep 24, 2006 6:32 am
But only the Warriors did... think about that. He was a free agent and picked the biggest offer. Why would anyone (at that time) sign with the Warriors if they weren't overpaying for him?. He had a lot of suitors, just not at that price. |
Hall of Famer
Posts: 21500
Joined: Thu Jul 21, 2005 7:50 am Location: Perth Poster Credit: 28 |
Posted: Sun Sep 24, 2006 7:20 am
I reckon he would have had a few teams after him migya make the ring fall on ya |
Hall of Famer
Posts: 18461
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:48 am Location: Somewhere in this site... Poster Credit: -4 |
Posted: Sun Sep 24, 2006 7:23 am
Yeah, from what I remember, San Antonio and other two teams wanted him... but not at that price. |
 All Star
Posts: 3086
Joined: Fri Jul 21, 2006 9:51 pm Location: Redwood City, CA Poster Credit: 0 |
Posted: Sun Sep 24, 2006 5:40 pm
Migya, the main problem with his contract is length. Last year, he earned his 6 million, but in a few years, that contract is going to produce nightmares.
|
Hall of Famer
Posts: 21500
Joined: Thu Jul 21, 2005 7:50 am Location: Perth Poster Credit: 28 |
Posted: Sun Sep 24, 2006 7:59 pm
Not our problem now 
migya make the ring fall on ya |
Hall of Famer
Posts: 18461
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:48 am Location: Somewhere in this site... Poster Credit: -4 |
Posted: Mon Sep 25, 2006 2:34 am
Yeah, it's lenght... it never goes over 7.5 million, but it has for more seasons in it. Fish will be 36 during his last season... and, honestly, I can't see him contributing at that age. Oh, well, as migya said, not our problem now. |
 Hall of Famer
Posts: 13539
Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2005 10:03 pm Location: Golden State Poster Credit: 53 |
Posted: Mon Sep 25, 2006 1:31 pm
This is exactly right. The Warriors outbid other teams for Derek Fisher. Think of the "Ben Wallace signing" this offseason... but on a much smaller scale (talent AND money).  GOLDEN STATE WARRIORS DIE HARD   |
Hall of Famer
Posts: 18461
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:48 am Location: Somewhere in this site... Poster Credit: -4 |
Posted: Mon Sep 25, 2006 1:35 pm
In other words, dumb. Why overpay for someone that isn't that good to begin with? If you're going to overpay for someone, it better be a star. |
Hall of Famer
Posts: 13539
Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2005 10:03 pm Location: Golden State Poster Credit: 53 |
Posted: Mon Sep 25, 2006 1:42 pm
Not necessarily. We needed a PG and a veteran. Fisher was a great addition to the Warriors, at the time. We overpaid... according to what Fisher was worth at the time, but we didn't break the bank on him. It's not like we gave him a 4-year, $60 million deal.
GOLDEN STATE WARRIORS DIE HARD |
Hall of Famer
Posts: 18461
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:48 am Location: Somewhere in this site... Poster Credit: -4 |
Posted: Mon Sep 25, 2006 1:45 pm
Yeah, but, according to my standards, the contract we gave him was dumb and the one you're proposing would be a "fire me" message by any GM. There's a difference. |
Hall of Famer
Posts: 13539
Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2005 10:03 pm Location: Golden State Poster Credit: 53 |
Posted: Mon Sep 25, 2006 1:56 pm
Overpaying is always dumb. That's why it's called 'over-paying'.
We paid Fisher what we needed to in order to get him on our team. We needed a PG and a veteran; Fish provided both. It's not that crazy to me. In fact, I'd say he over-achieved last year from what we expected out of him. GOLDEN STATE WARRIORS DIE HARD |
Hall of Famer
Posts: 18461
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:48 am Location: Somewhere in this site... Poster Credit: -4 |
Posted: Mon Sep 25, 2006 2:07 pm
Not if it helps your team get to the next level. I think that the Bulls signing Big Ben (and the way they did it, with only a 4 year contract) is smart overpaying. |
 Franchise Player
Posts: 9202
Joined: Mon Aug 14, 2006 11:07 pm Location: Land of the Lacob. Poster Credit: 0 |
Posted: Mon Sep 25, 2006 3:49 pm
Well the way you describe overpaying, all I can say is that he MUST perform up to the money's worth, improve the team, and take em deep in the playoffs. If he doesn't, then you just cost yourself some extra cash to reel in the fish from the FA.
Don't hate yourself in the morning... sleep 'til noon.
|
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 2 guests
The team
Delete all board cookies• All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ]
RSS
Chat
FAQ
TMC's Profile