RSS
Chat
FAQ
hows about instead of harrington, we go after josh smith
Moderators: Mr. Crackerz, JREED, Guybrush, hobbes
10 posts
• Page 1 of 1
 Posted: Mon Jul 03, 2006 10:52 pm
smith at SF gets an absurd number of blocks. let Al go to indy and we somehow try and get smith.
|
|
what?'s Profile
Starting Lineup
Posts: 985
Joined: Thu Feb 16, 2006 4:53 pm Poster Credit: 0 |
Posted: Mon Jul 03, 2006 11:35 pm
Atl would be stupid to do so now. Maybe they'd still entertain a BD offer ( BD/POB/Kosta/Zarko for S&T Harrington/Smith/Lue? ) but I doubt it ---***030***---
|
 Hall of Famer
Posts: 18461
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:48 am Location: Somewhere in this site... Poster Credit: -3 |
Posted: Mon Jul 03, 2006 11:51 pm
Yeah. There's a big difference between those two. Harrington is on the market, Smith ain't. |
 Hall of Famer
Posts: 20894
Joined: Thu Jul 21, 2005 7:50 am Location: Perth Poster Credit: 21 |
Posted: Thu Jul 06, 2006 1:43 am
Josh Smith is untouchable right now! He has alot of potential and had a great last couple of months of the season! Getting him would give the team a great defensive presence but the Hawks wouldn't want any of the players on the Warriors right now, except maybe O'bryant, a Center that has not failed yet and so is still hyped as having many skills
  migya make the ring fall on ya |
|
Posted: Sun Jul 09, 2006 3:41 pm
I wouldnt mind taking Josh Smith for Patrick o Bryant
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jul 09, 2006 4:49 pm
I don’t think anyone would mind—except Atlanta. Hell, I’d take Sene for O’bryant just on rep alone.
|
|
Hall of Famer
Posts: 20894
Joined: Thu Jul 21, 2005 7:50 am Location: Perth Poster Credit: 21 |
Posted: Tue Jul 11, 2006 1:02 am
O'bryant and Pietrus for Josh smith and future 1st rounder or even 2nd rounder could be viable! I'd go for that
migya make the ring fall on ya |
Hall of Famer
Posts: 18461
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:48 am Location: Somewhere in this site... Poster Credit: -3 |
Posted: Tue Jul 11, 2006 1:13 am
Viable for us, sure... Atlanta would be crazy to go for that. Also, the Hawks are in the middle of a court case regarding their legitimate owner. They're not allowed to sign players with contracts of more than one year or something like that (besides Claxton, as the ruling came right after the signing). I don't know the details, but they're severely hampered when it comes to signings. Every signing would probably require an agreement between the parts or to be allowed by the judge. http://www.ajc.com/blogs/content/shared-blogs/ajc/hawks/entries/2006/07/07/handcuffing_the.html |
Hall of Famer
Posts: 20894
Joined: Thu Jul 21, 2005 7:50 am Location: Perth Poster Credit: 21 |
Posted: Tue Jul 11, 2006 1:48 am
The Hawks need a Center and O'bryant was a lottery pick and not proven to be great or horrible yet. The Hawks would need to view Pietrus as an emerging player to go for this, something they might think a bit but not enough to trade Smith.
Unless Foyle is traded there are just too many Centers on the team (three) and they will not all be used effectively. Probable that Foyle will be used the most and O'bryant the least, leading to a waste of time! migya make the ring fall on ya |
Hall of Famer
Posts: 18461
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:48 am Location: Somewhere in this site... Poster Credit: -3 |
Posted: Tue Jul 11, 2006 1:50 am
I think we'll go with three centers this season. I'm not sure the team is sold on Biedrins and "The Chef" ain't ready yet, so I'm pretty sure there will be no trades regarding our centers, unless we're getting another center.
|
10 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests
The team
Delete all board cookies• All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ]Powered by phpBB© 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group