Golden State Warriors Message Board - NBA Basketball Discussion Forum • View topic - B. Davis, Dunleavy, Murphy & our #9 for Garnett & th

Board index » General Forum » Trades

Change font size

Print view

B. Davis, Dunleavy, Murphy & our #9 for Garnett & th

Moderators: Mr. Crackerz, JREED, Guybrush, hobbes

Post a reply

11 posts • Page 1 of 1

WarriorChris WarriorChris's Profile Rookie Posts: 14 Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2006 8:53 pm Location: Peoria, AZ Poster Credit: 0	Posted: Tue Jun 27, 2006 9:37 pm That would give us a starting line up of... Ellis J-Rich Diogu Garnett O'Bryant/Biedrens/Foyle We could use the #6 for a big man. O'Bryant may be too much of a reach that high but many would be looking to move up to that spot. I just see how the Warriors can take a guy at #9 and not make a trade. To me, J-Rich, Ike & Monta are keepers and all else can be moved.
Top

tHe_pEsTiLeNcE tHe_pEsTiLeNcE's Profile tHe_pEsTiLeNcE's Website All Star Posts: 2558 Joined: Thu Mar 23, 2006 8:53 am Location: where you aren't Poster Credit: 0	Posted: Tue Jun 27, 2006 11:03 pm they would have to throw in troy hudson and bracey wright for the trade to work under the collective bargaining agreement
Top

tHe_pEsTiLeNcE tHe_pEsTiLeNcE's Profile tHe_pEsTiLeNcE's Website All Star Posts: 2558 Joined: Thu Mar 23, 2006 8:53 am Location: where you aren't Poster Credit: 0	Posted: Tue Jun 27, 2006 11:05 pm or take dunnyboy out
Top

Guest Guest's Profile	Posted: Tue Jun 27, 2006 11:06 pm tHe_dIsEaSe wrote:they would have to throw in troy hudson and bracey wright for the trade to work under the collective bargaining agreement I thought the salaries needed to match up with-in a certain amount and not the number of players. maybe I added up the salaries wrong... I know they want to get rid of Rickey Davis.
Top

TMC TMC's Profile Hall of Famer Posts: 18461 Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:48 am Location: Somewhere in this site... Poster Credit: -3	Posted: Wed Jun 28, 2006 1:08 am Great. Why hasn't it happened yet?... Oh yeah, it's because the trade is dumb for Minny.
Top

Guest Guest's Profile	Posted: Wed Jun 28, 2006 3:44 am TMC wrote:Great. Why hasn't it happened yet?... Oh yeah, it's because the trade is dumb for Minny. Are you an NBA GM? smart a**
Top

TMC TMC's Profile Hall of Famer Posts: 18461 Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:48 am Location: Somewhere in this site... Poster Credit: -3	Posted: Wed Jun 28, 2006 4:30 am smart a** At least I'm smart enough to register on the site, "guest".
Top

32 32's Profile Hall of Famer Posts: 12981 Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2005 10:03 pm Location: Golden State Poster Credit: 41	Posted: Wed Jun 28, 2006 12:32 pm More BS trades for Garnett. Greeeeat. GOLDEN STATE WARRIORS DIE HARD
Top

Elemental Elemental's Profile Rookie Posts: 112 Joined: Wed Dec 07, 2005 10:53 pm Poster Credit: 0	Posted: Thu Jun 29, 2006 7:54 pm Diogu at SF? hahah
Top

Hall of Famer

Posts: 20888
Joined: Thu Jul 21, 2005 7:50 am
Location: Perth
Poster Credit: 21

Posted: Fri Jun 30, 2006 4:39 am

But Baron, dun, Murphy and O'bryant for Ratliff, Wally, Delonte, Powe and Celts 1st pick in next draft is more likely and better for both teams.

Celts get a great PG finally, producing PF and a legit Center. Warriors get combo allround guard, very good SF, very good defending P/C, the local star college boy and potential top5 pick in next draft!

migya make the ring fall on ya

Top

All Star

Posts: 2558
Joined: Thu Mar 23, 2006 8:53 am
Location: where you aren't
Poster Credit: 0

Posted: Fri Jun 30, 2006 11:55 am

Anonymous wrote:
tHe_dIsEaSe wrote:they would have to throw in troy hudson and bracey wright for the trade to work under the collective bargaining agreement

I thought the salaries needed to match up with-in a certain amount and not the number of players.
maybe I added up the salaries wrong...
I know they want to get rid of Rickey Davis.

yes, you added the salaries wrong

Top

Post a reply

11 posts • Page 1 of 1

Return to Trades

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests