Basically, what I'm saying is that expirers are worth a whole lot more than Foyle or Dunleavy. Would YOU be willing to throw away an expiring contract (that may potentially pay for a free agent center like Joel Pryzbilla) in exchange for Adonal Foyle?
Most people are claiming, "Well, so-and-so has a hole at small forward, so they'd gladly take Dunleavy in a trade for <insert-expirer>"... but isn't it more likely that a team would allow that contract to expire in order to pursue a better small forward in the free agent market...?
The ESPN Warrior clubhouse forums are littered with these. Nonstop trade proposals that are nothing more than obvious, unlikely salary dumps... unloading Foyle, Dunleavy, Fisher, and Murphy (oh, and Pietrus, too... gotta make the trade's "fair"

When are people going to realize that this sort of ideal situation for Golden State (all the while, screwing 3 other teams out of interesting young prospects in the process) just isn't going to happen? I understand the pain, people, but let's keep things realistic...