RSS
Chat
FAQ
Good trade with Indiana.
Moderators: Mr. Crackerz, JREED, Guybrush, hobbes
39 posts
• Page 2 of 3 • 1, 2, 3
Starting Lineup
Posts: 985
Joined: Thu Feb 16, 2006 4:53 pm Poster Credit: 0 |
 Posted: Tue May 02, 2006 12:28 am
Granger, IMO, is a keeper 4 Indy. If you were IND management, would you okay it? Probably not without a bunch of picks---***030***---
|
zero3zero's Profile
 Hall of Famer
Posts: 13127
Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2005 10:03 pm Location: Golden State Poster Credit: 43 |
Posted: Tue May 02, 2006 12:32 am
Yeah, they probably view Granger in the same way that we view Diogu. But it doesn't mean he's there yet. As far as this trade's concerned, he's still an unproven rookie whose only flashed a few outstanding games.
 GOLDEN STATE WARRIORS DIE HARD   |
|
Posted: Tue May 02, 2006 5:08 pm
And also, Granger will not get in the way of Diogu because he would play the 3. No worrys, he can easily do that, I was reading an Indiana Pacers blog and they were even thinking about putting him at 2.
I definately agree that Indiana is not going to just give up Granger. I think throwing in maybe one first round pick would make this irresistible to Indiana. |
|
 Hall of Famer
Posts: 18461
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:48 am Location: Somewhere in this site... Poster Credit: -3 |
Posted: Wed May 03, 2006 2:44 am
I think this is the more biased trade I've read in this section.
DO IT!!!!! |
|
Posted: Wed May 03, 2006 6:36 am
Indiana would never do this trade Baron can stay here J-Rich is really your only player of value without him not to many teams are gonna be willing to trade anyone of any quality and trust my when I say NOBODY WANTS FOYLE. That dude sucks and Granger ain't going anywhere.
|
|
 Hall of Famer
Posts: 20935
Joined: Thu Jul 21, 2005 7:50 am Location: Perth Poster Credit: 22 |
Posted: Wed May 03, 2006 7:47 am
But Granger is a potential star, more so than Murphy. Pietrus is a potentially great player but his value is unfortunately lower than it was last offseason. In all a good trade for the Pacers but they are losing a superstar big guy and they are harder to find than star guards. Jermaine would have to be Center and so would not be ahead of Diogu   migya make the ring fall on ya |
Hall of Famer
Posts: 20935
Joined: Thu Jul 21, 2005 7:50 am Location: Perth Poster Credit: 22 |
Posted: Wed May 03, 2006 7:50 am
The Pacers would be smart to keep Granger for another two seasons at least and see if he can be a real star or not. The thing is that he plays SF and SJackson would have to be SG all the time and Peja would have to go. Granger right now is coming off the bench and that is not going to allow him to be a star at all migya make the ring fall on ya |
Hall of Famer
Posts: 20935
Joined: Thu Jul 21, 2005 7:50 am Location: Perth Poster Credit: 22 |
Posted: Wed May 03, 2006 7:51 am
Baron Davis would be the greatest PG in the Pacers history!!!! Yea, losing Jermaine would be alot but Baron is not garbage! migya make the ring fall on ya |
|
Posted: Wed May 03, 2006 10:21 am
Baron Davis would be the greatest PG in the Pacers history!!!!
Yea, losing Jermaine would be alot but Baron is not garbage![/quote] Baron is trouble. Great player but he is trouble we just got rid of Artest and we have other charter issues we don't need another head case that might get upset and screw up our hole season like he did to the Hornets. I think Mark Jackson is better than Baron in my oppion. |
|
Hall of Famer
Posts: 20935
Joined: Thu Jul 21, 2005 7:50 am Location: Perth Poster Credit: 22 |
Posted: Wed May 03, 2006 10:39 am
NO!!!! Baron Davis is not the most passive personality but he is not in the same category as artest when it comes to bonehead attitude! Artest fuked up any chance of the Pacers winning anything this season! migya make the ring fall on ya |
Hall of Famer
Posts: 13127
Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2005 10:03 pm Location: Golden State Poster Credit: 43 |
Posted: Wed May 03, 2006 12:03 pm
Exactly. We'd love it. They wouldn't. GOLDEN STATE WARRIORS DIE HARD |
|
Posted: Wed May 03, 2006 7:18 pm
How about throwing in Biedrins and a first round draft pick? That would more than even out the trade.
|
|
Hall of Famer
Posts: 13127
Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2005 10:03 pm Location: Golden State Poster Credit: 43 |
Posted: Wed May 03, 2006 8:16 pm
I'd be against it, at that point. We'd be throwing away our future starting lineup for a power forward coming off his 10th NBA season. No thanks.
GOLDEN STATE WARRIORS DIE HARD |
Hall of Famer
Posts: 20935
Joined: Thu Jul 21, 2005 7:50 am Location: Perth Poster Credit: 22 |
Posted: Thu May 04, 2006 1:38 am
That seems good enough and Mullin would go for ir as Jermaine is a PF/C that is only 28 years old and has another 8 years left at the current level. The Pacers probably still wouldn't do this trade migya make the ring fall on ya |
|
Posted: Thu May 04, 2006 7:18 am
Are you kidding? Indiana would get a young, hardworking with potential center. A decent power forward who is a good rebounder. A defensive stopper to replace Artest, and a great PG to complement Peja. And a draft pick. What's not to like?
|
|
39 posts
• Page 2 of 3 • 1, 2, 3
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests
The team
Delete all board cookies• All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ]Powered by phpBB© 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group