Potential Warriors-Bobcats Trade

Discuss any moves or trades here, real, rumored, made up, you name it!

Moderators: Mr. Crackerz, JREED, Guybrush, hobbes

User avatar
Hall of Famer
Posts: 21381
Joined: Thu Jul 21, 2005 7:50 am
Location: Perth
Poster Credit: 27
PostPosted: Mon Apr 10, 2006 9:01 pm
The defense of Gerald Wallace alone makes him a very valuable player! This guy gets a ton of steals and blocks when healthy! He scores quite well also.

Getting rid of dunnyboy really is a dream now isn't it :mrgreen:
Fishdog is playing well but Monta is better and needs the court time, so Fishnuts is expendable!
Murphy's looking more and more like a rebound only white cuunt that needs to make way for Diogu!

This trade looks good when you look at it properly
Image



Image


migya make the ring fall on ya
User avatar
Hall of Famer
Posts: 13536
Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2005 10:03 pm
Location: Golden State
Poster Credit: 52
PostPosted: Mon Apr 10, 2006 10:25 pm
migya wrote:This trade looks good when you look at it properl

So does "properly" mean ignoring the rules regarding salary...?

Enter this deal into the ESPN trade machine. See what comes up. Void. Therefore, no deal. It's pretty simple.
Image
GOLDEN STATE WARRIORS DIE HARD
Image
Image

Starting Lineup
Posts: 985
Joined: Thu Feb 16, 2006 4:53 pm
Poster Credit: 0
PostPosted: Tue Apr 11, 2006 1:11 am
I don't think it incorporates Dun's new salary(it should though). I'm (obviously) not a pro on da CBA, and yes the $$ seems rather lopsided, but it should work. Charlotte probably wouldn't do a #1 unless it has plenty firsts to dangle. They seem content on doing this the "right way" so unloading decent overpriced talent on em doesn't seem plausible... I think we have a better chance dealing with the Hawks cuz they need a PG & PF. I have a feeling that Al gonna get his "Super Murph" money this offseason...
User avatar
Hall of Famer
Posts: 18461
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:48 am
Location: Somewhere in this site...
Poster Credit: -4
PostPosted: Tue Apr 11, 2006 1:47 am
#32 wrote:Enter this deal into the ESPN trade machine. See what comes up. Void. Therefore, no deal. It's pretty simple.


The trade machine doesn't work with Charlotte. They still don't have their full cap, and therefore can take over all those salaries. They started in their first year with only 1/3 of their cap available, 2/3 last season, and by next season they'll have the full cap, so this trade can be done, but not until the point at which they get their full cap.
User avatar
Hall of Famer
Posts: 21381
Joined: Thu Jul 21, 2005 7:50 am
Location: Perth
Poster Credit: 27
PostPosted: Tue Apr 11, 2006 7:43 am
#32 wrote:
migya wrote:This trade looks good when you look at it properl

So does "properly" mean ignoring the rules regarding salary...?

Enter this deal into the ESPN trade machine. See what comes up. Void. Therefore, no deal. It's pretty simple.



Look at what TMC wrote! A proper trade indeed
Image



Image


migya make the ring fall on ya
User avatar
Hall of Famer
Posts: 13536
Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2005 10:03 pm
Location: Golden State
Poster Credit: 52
PostPosted: Tue Apr 11, 2006 10:49 am
TMC wrote:The trade machine doesn't work with Charlotte. They still don't have their full cap, and therefore can take over all those salaries. They started in their first year with only 1/3 of their cap available, 2/3 last season, and by next season they'll have the full cap, so this trade can be done, but not until the point at which they get their full cap.

http://games.espn.go.com/nba/features/t ... 30~30~30~9

Yes, Charlotte's under the cap NOW... but this trade puts them $100,000 over the cap (which means the salary rules now apply). The trade works for Golden State, but not for the Bobcats. This trade would work with simply Murphy and Dunleavy, but Fisher's contract pushes it over the limit.
Image
GOLDEN STATE WARRIORS DIE HARD
Image
Image
User avatar
Hall of Famer
Posts: 18461
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:48 am
Location: Somewhere in this site...
Poster Credit: -4
PostPosted: Tue Apr 11, 2006 11:06 am
Read my post again. The trade doesn't work now because Charlotte still doesn't have their full cap, but it will once they get the 1/3 they still don't have, which will happen at some point during the offseason, or at the start of the next season. THEN, the trade will work (pending on what they spend on new signings, of course)

PostPosted: Tue Apr 11, 2006 9:33 pm
if the trade don't work for salary reasons or it puts charlotte dangerously close to the salary cap then replace the 1st round pick with one or two of their little used players. this trade is mainly for clearing our unneccessary cap space, all we need imo is a young bloke who can play defence (wallace), we got some great players and veterans in davis, j-rich n foyle (ok he's just a veteran) and we got a great talent of young guys who need court time now
User avatar
Hall of Famer
Posts: 18461
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:48 am
Location: Somewhere in this site...
Poster Credit: -4
PostPosted: Wed Apr 12, 2006 2:25 am
It's not that the trade doesn't work. It's that it makes no sense for Charlotte...
User avatar
Hall of Famer
Posts: 21381
Joined: Thu Jul 21, 2005 7:50 am
Location: Perth
Poster Credit: 27
PostPosted: Wed Apr 12, 2006 4:54 am
TMC wrote:It's not that the trade doesn't work. It's that it makes no sense for Charlotte...



But we don't like Charlotte and we are only thinking about our Warriors :)
Image



Image


migya make the ring fall on ya
User avatar
Hall of Famer
Posts: 18461
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:48 am
Location: Somewhere in this site...
Poster Credit: -4
PostPosted: Wed Apr 12, 2006 5:57 am
migya wrote:
TMC wrote:It's not that the trade doesn't work. It's that it makes no sense for Charlotte...



But we don't like Charlotte and we are only thinking about our Warriors :)


Sure, then do it. And, if we're going to think only on the Warriors side, we could also trade Dun for Lebron, Baron for Wade, Murph for KG and Foyle for Duncan.

But... no, forget it. Now that I think of it, Monty would f*ck that team, too... :mrgreen:
User avatar
Hall of Famer
Posts: 21381
Joined: Thu Jul 21, 2005 7:50 am
Location: Perth
Poster Credit: 27
PostPosted: Wed Apr 12, 2006 7:56 am
TMC wrote:
migya wrote:
TMC wrote:It's not that the trade doesn't work. It's that it makes no sense for Charlotte...



But we don't like Charlotte and we are only thinking about our Warriors :)


Sure, then do it. And, if we're going to think only on the Warriors side, we could also trade Dun for Lebron, Baron for Wade, Murph for KG and Foyle for Duncan.

But... no, forget it. Now that I think of it, Monty would f*ck that team, too... :mrgreen:



This proposed trade with the Bobcats is not that bad as they are getting players that could make them better, it just hinders their chances of getting other players in the future through free agency.

Yes, Monty seems to know how to fuk things up real well
Image



Image


migya make the ring fall on ya
Previous

Return to Trades

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Yahoo [Bot] and 1 guest

cron