martin wrote:warriorsstepup wrote:martin wrote:we never have energy off the start. wtf? is it on design to play agressive with tempo only when subs come in or is it athletic disadvantage of our starters?
Lack of intensity, its so obvious, everyone seems a step slower than usual.
but it seems we pretty much always start slow, well, at least 7 out of 10 games. maybe it's too much intensity resulting from philosophy to be that nasty defensive team and becoming somewhat too tense on offense. or we just have slow backcourt that cannot leak out which results in slow tempo. i think our best moments are with curry and thompson appart. too bad we have no other two, but some sort of combining needs to be made to jump start the games. while we are average to quite good on defense, our offense seems to be lagging quite some.
Good catch, I have not watched majority of the games, but ones I have seen they do start slow. I think its a lack of focus, maybe butterflies, or maybe they might have to play some small ball to start, with Landry and Lee. I am just saying that for experimental reasons, you never know what will work.
I prefer having Jack playing PG, and Curry playing SG, as Klay just is in a major, major slump.
Its good to see the defense coming along as it is, this was suppose to be a team more offensive minded, but Lee, Curry, Klay have each had individual slumps that have hurt the team.
Am saying more Barnes will do too, although he is playing within the offense now, they might have to initiate more plays for him.
RSS
Chat
FAQ
martin's Profile
[/quote
hobbes's Website
