Ellis said he wants out and he got it.
AB said he wants out.
Dorrel said he wants out.
SJ didn't had a chance to speak but there is no nead, we want him out.
So which is gone be our next trade?
The clock is ticking.
OK. AB + Dorrel + SJ for ....???
Moderators: Mr. Crackerz, JREED, Guybrush, 32
http://insider.espn.go.com/nba/features/rumors
About half way down the page has a little rundown of the Warriors motives.
If they are able to trade Jackson then I REALLY like this trade, especially if they can also get rid of Biedrins or Wright, they are just not working out anymore.
If they don't trade Jackson then GS officially lost this trade.
About half way down the page has a little rundown of the Warriors motives.
If they are able to trade Jackson then I REALLY like this trade, especially if they can also get rid of Biedrins or Wright, they are just not working out anymore.
If they don't trade Jackson then GS officially lost this trade.
I'd like to see all those three you mentioned ASAP, but that's wishing a fair bit to say the least. SJack, the cancer he is, has to go for peace and a real transition I think.
Maybe trying to trade two or all three for a package getting back a starting SF can be done. Be it Prince, Odom, GWallace or some other SF, something getting done would be great. In fact, either of those three SFs I mentioned I'd really like to have, Prince to a lesser extent, but what a great set of trading it would be to get one of those players that seem out of favour in their current teams and would do nothing but improve our team, fitting in well and providing needs
Maybe trying to trade two or all three for a package getting back a starting SF can be done. Be it Prince, Odom, GWallace or some other SF, something getting done would be great. In fact, either of those three SFs I mentioned I'd really like to have, Prince to a lesser extent, but what a great set of trading it would be to get one of those players that seem out of favour in their current teams and would do nothing but improve our team, fitting in well and providing needs
SJax for Blatche... wizards don't want Blatche.
Wizards would have to take on SJax for this year and next, but they get rid of the 4 remaining on Blatche's contract, including this year. Gives us size behind D. Lee too.
However we can't add anyone besides SJax in a trade due to league rules. It doesn't look like we will have enough time to get SJax to do physical and then do another trade.
Wizards would have to take on SJax for this year and next, but they get rid of the 4 remaining on Blatche's contract, including this year. Gives us size behind D. Lee too.
However we can't add anyone besides SJax in a trade due to league rules. It doesn't look like we will have enough time to get SJax to do physical and then do another trade.
: 2010 - 2011