KG

Discuss anything related to Golden State Warriors basketball here

Moderators: Mr. Crackerz, JREED, Guybrush, 32

User avatar

Hall of Famer
Posts: 18315
» Wed Feb 01, 2006 9:25 am
Problem is ... you ain't offering potential. Just the worst players of our team. There would be a better offer. That's why Artest is on the Kings.
User avatar

Moderator
Posts: 13751
» Wed Feb 01, 2006 2:16 pm
TMC wrote:Problem is ... you ain't offering potential. Just the worst players of our team.

That's what all these "could-be" trades are always about! People trying to pull Kevin Garnett, Paul Pierce, or some other huge star out of their ass for Mickael Pietrus, Andris Biedrins, and draft picks! It's a joke!
User avatar

Hall of Famer
Posts: 22007
» Fri Feb 03, 2006 6:55 am
What's a joke is some of the attitudes thinking that some of the players on the Warriors' bench, such as Biedrins and Pietrus are useless! The reality is that players on the TWolves bench bench, like Medvedenko and such, are shiit! They would have to start fresh without KG and they would want young talent! End of story! The Warriors offer the best young talent in the league with the flexibility of contract length ie. Most of the young guys on the Warriors are coming to the end of their rookie contracts
User avatar

Moderator
Posts: 13751
» Fri Feb 03, 2006 9:52 am
migya wrote:The reality is that players on the TWolves bench bench, like Medvedenko and such, are shiit!

So...? You're saying that they'd give up the most powerful franchise player in the league (aside from Shaq) simply to revitilize their bench?!? I'm not buying it...

Pietrus and Biedrins have skill, but you'd need to add Baron Davis or Jason Richardson to the equation before the Wolves took it seriously. Think about it... would WE trade Baron Davis away for Jose Calderon and Joey Graham??? It's the same idea: young, "potentially" great players in exchange for a proven franchise star! It would never work!

All Star
Posts: 1216
» Fri Feb 03, 2006 10:08 am
But isn't it nice to think you can sucker them into a trade tho?

Tim
User avatar

Hall of Famer
Posts: 18315
» Fri Feb 03, 2006 10:45 am
migya wrote:What's a joke is some of the attitudes thinking that some of the players on the Warriors' bench, such as Biedrins and Pietrus are useless!


They aren't useless. They're just not enough for an MVP.

Those players would be alright if they were part of a bigger package, with at least one star (J-Rich or Baron).

Look what Miami had to give to LA for Shaq: Odom, Caron Butler, Brian Grant (this one just to make salaries work) and a pick (maybe two, I can't remember right now). And Shaq was the one that forced the trade there...
» Sun Feb 05, 2006 2:11 pm
hmmm....

Diogu, Dunleavey, Ellis, and 2 future first rounders

for garnet

i think that is fair....
» Sun Feb 05, 2006 2:12 pm
hmmm....

Diogu, Dunleavey, Ellis, and 3 future first rounders

for garnet

i think that is fair....

Starting Lineup
Posts: 935
» Sun Feb 05, 2006 2:13 pm
Anonymous wrote:hmmm....

Diogu, Dunleavey, Ellis, and 3 future first rounders

for garnet

i think that is fair....



haha...

STUPID idea

Starting Lineup
Posts: 935
» Sun Feb 05, 2006 2:14 pm
why not say, lets trade THUNDER for GARNET.... LOL

Starting Lineup
Posts: 563
» Sun Feb 05, 2006 3:09 pm
~W~ wrote:why not say, lets trade THUNDER for GARNET.... LOL


That's an easy trade to accept!
User avatar

Moderator
Posts: 13751
» Mon Feb 06, 2006 12:41 am
Not if you're the Timberwolves, like he was implying.

Rookie
Posts: 40
» Mon Feb 06, 2006 6:30 pm
we arent going to get kg for nothing guys. it would probaly take jrich, diogu, pietris, and a pick.
User avatar

Moderator
Posts: 13751
» Mon Feb 06, 2006 10:04 pm
We aren't GETTING Garnett, period, so it's time to stop all the fantasy talk...

The most unbelievably unrealistic reoccuring trend here is a Garnett thread...
User avatar

Role Player
Posts: 376
» Mon Feb 06, 2006 10:59 pm
#32 wrote:The most unbelievably unrealistic reoccuring trend here is a Garnett thread...


Exactly. It would take JRich or Baron to get Garnett, which we won't do.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Yahoo [Bot] and 6 guests