Target: Small Forward

Discuss anything related to Golden State Warriors basketball here

Moderators: Mr. Crackerz, JREED, Guybrush, 32


All Star
Posts: 1469
» Sun Jun 27, 2010 7:40 pm
GoldenStJayhawk wrote:it's funny. You go on Philli boards and Iggy to them is what maggs was to us



If he were to come over here in a year people are going to be comparing him to S-Jax. The guy is ball dominant but has passing ability; he is not the greatest shooter and not much of a natural scorer. He does have more hustle than either Jax or Maggs though.

He's not perfect, but I'd take him over Jax and Maggs.

Quazza wrote:I'd take him for Monta, straight up, in a heart beat.


I think it's fair value, but Philly wouldn't do that deal. They have their Monta in Lou Williams.

All Star
Posts: 3310
» Mon Jun 28, 2010 3:49 am
GoldenStJayhawk wrote:
Quazza wrote:it's funny. You go on Philli boards and Iggy to them is what maggs was to us


I'd take him for Monta, straight up, in a heart beat.


co-signed
User avatar

All Star
Posts: 1027
» Mon Jun 28, 2010 8:47 am
GoldenStJayhawk wrote:
Quazza wrote:it's funny. You go on Philli boards and Iggy to them is what maggs was to us


I'd take him for Monta, straight up, in a heart beat.

They have Evan Turner dude. Their not trading for an SF. Iggy for Biedrins and Udoh? I never wanted to give up AR or Udoh, but...
User avatar

All Star
Posts: 2860
» Mon Jun 28, 2010 5:14 pm
monta for iggy

monta for granger

isn't happening
User avatar

Role Player
Posts: 392
» Mon Jun 28, 2010 5:24 pm
LilBallerx30 wrote:
GoldenStJayhawk wrote:I'd take him for Monta, straight up, in a heart beat.


They have Evan Turner dude. Their not trading for an SF.


Monta is a sf?
User avatar

All Star
Posts: 2562
» Mon Jun 28, 2010 5:32 pm
GoldenStJayhawk wrote:
LilBallerx30 wrote:
GoldenStJayhawk wrote:I'd take him for Monta, straight up, in a heart beat.


They have Evan Turner dude. Their not trading for an SF.


Monta is a sf?


Image
User avatar

Franchise Player
Posts: 9163
» Mon Jun 28, 2010 7:17 pm
GoldenStJayhawk wrote:
LilBallerx30 wrote:
GoldenStJayhawk wrote:I'd take him for Monta, straight up, in a heart beat.


They have Evan Turner dude. Their not trading for an SF.


Monta is a sf?


Yep.

Well, at least in Nelson's system he is.
User avatar

All Star
Posts: 1027
» Mon Jun 28, 2010 11:23 pm
xbay wrote:
GoldenStJayhawk wrote:
LilBallerx30 wrote:
GoldenStJayhawk wrote:I'd take him for Monta, straight up, in a heart beat.


They have Evan Turner dude. Their not trading for an SF.


Monta is a sf?


Yep.

Well, at least in Nelson's system he is.

Before more people comment on this:

I meant SG :shock:
User avatar

All Star
Posts: 1530
» Tue Jun 29, 2010 9:33 am
Here's an idea that's mostly about getting rid of Biedrins contract...

Biedrins - 9,000,000 (5 years)
Bell - 3,602,960 (3 years)
Radmanovic - 6,466,600 (2 years)

for

Kikilenko - 16,452,000 (2 years)
Price - 1,250,000 (2 years)

The only contract we'd have open after next season would be Monta's, and we'd get AK-47 for a season :)
User avatar

All Star
Posts: 1027
» Tue Jun 29, 2010 9:53 am
Chum wrote:Here's an idea that's mostly about getting rid of Biedrins contract...

Biedrins - 9,000,000 (5 years)
Bell - 3,602,960 (3 years)
Radmanovic - 6,466,600 (2 years)

for

Kikilenko - 16,452,000 (2 years)
Price - 1,250,000 (2 years)

The only contract we'd have open after next season would be Monta's, and we'd get AK-47 for a season :)

HE EARNS 16MILLION?! whatdahell
User avatar

All Star
Posts: 1530
» Tue Jun 29, 2010 11:56 am
LilBallerx30 wrote:
Chum wrote:Here's an idea that's mostly about getting rid of Biedrins contract...

Biedrins - 9,000,000 (5 years)
Bell - 3,602,960 (3 years)
Radmanovic - 6,466,600 (2 years)

for

Kikilenko - 16,452,000 (2 years)
Price - 1,250,000 (2 years)

The only contract we'd have open after next season would be Monta's, and we'd get AK-47 for a season :)

HE EARNS 16MILLION?! whatdahell


Kirilenko is a stud on offense and defense. I'd love it if he played out his remaining years with the Warriors. Besides, who'd make a better warrior than AK-47 :)

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EyjtsMSGj2w[/youtube]
User avatar

Franchise Player
Posts: 6107
» Tue Jun 29, 2010 12:00 pm
Kirilenko is a stud of OFFENSE???? Come on Chum, you know better than that.
User avatar

All Star
Posts: 1530
» Tue Jun 29, 2010 12:03 pm
bada wrote:Kirilenko is a stud of OFFENSE???? Come on Chum, you know better than that.


I'm taking his passing into account :)

What do you think of this trade though Bada?
User avatar

Franchise Player
Posts: 6107
» Tue Jun 29, 2010 12:12 pm
Chum wrote:
bada wrote:Kirilenko is a stud of OFFENSE???? Come on Chum, you know better than that.


I'm taking his passing into account :)

What do you think of this trade though Bada?


I can't answer that objectively as I can not stand Kirilenko. I would puke if I saw him in a W's uni. Top 3 most hated current players for me and beyond that, I dont think he is even very good. He plays good defense but cant shoot and cant rebound ... everyone I talk to thinks he is way better than what I think so I am willing to admit that it could be that I dislike him so much that it warps my perception of him as a player but this would trade would be a HUGE blow to my Warriors "fandom"
User avatar

All Star
Posts: 2562
» Tue Jun 29, 2010 12:16 pm
Sorry, Kirilenko will never be a Warrior. Not because I'm not a fan of him, but because he get physically raped on national TV by Baron Davis. You can't sign up for the team that raped your relevance out of you.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot] and 2 guests