tradedunleavy wrote:Im sure you dont pay a fourth or fifth option 7-8 million a year.

Im also sure you dont draft a 4th or 5th option with the third overall pick.

And im also sure your 4th or 5th option should be able to play defense if he only has a 'good offensive game' once a week.

This is the sad truth.

In fact, I agree with #32 than Dun may be a decent 5th option or a good player coming from the bench. But he wasn't drafted for that, and, definitely, he's not paid like that...

#32 wrote:Give the guy proper credit. He's not a reliable player, but he's a good one to have as a 4th option because he can come up big on various nights. Isn't that the ideal 4th or 5th option? A guy who has a great game every once and a while?

But you have said in the past that he was the third option and a pretty good one! Now your saying that he's a 5th option......... You seem to forget what a criticiser of Dunleavy you were when you first started posting and the fact that you DON'T have to defend a player to make him look good or respectable, his own performaces do.

The point and only point here is - Dunleavy was selected by the Warriors to be a very good player and has not been and that he has gotten a FAT new contract and has responded by playing some of the most pathetic basketball seen in this franchise for quite some time!

Don't worry, Dunleavy does not read these posts, so heis not sad about us! We simply voice our opinions to one another!

Please #32, please - DON'T TURN INTO ANOTHER BROE! It would be awful to see that happen

Don't worry, Dunleavy does not read these posts, so heis not sad about us! We simply voice our opinions to one another!

Dunleavy doesnt read these?!?!?!? I gotta go.