RSS
Chat
FAQ
Should we trade for Jamal Tinsley in the offseason?
Moderators: Mr. Crackerz, JREED, Guybrush, hobbes
17 posts
• Page 1 of 2 • 1, 2
 Posted: Mon Mar 16, 2009 2:48 am
Ellis is clearly not a PG or a leader, Nelly gambled and lossed. We clearly have too many 'in-it-for-themselves' scorers on the team. What would be so bad about going after Jamal Tinsley who happens to be a pretty good PG. We gave S. Jackson a 2nd chance after he beat the crap out of a fan, I think Tinsley deserves a chance. Worst thing that can happen is it fails and we cut him. It's not like he'd ruin any chemistry because this team has lost it's chemistry after cutting BD, Al, and Barnes and adding losers Crawford and Maggette. Thoughts?
|
|
GSW2006's Profile
|
Posted: Mon Mar 16, 2009 3:07 am
here's a far fetched scenario
- trade Crawford for Tinsley + filler player - trade Ellis + Mags for Boozer (sign+trade) + AK47 - fire Nelson and hire Avery Johnson d will ellis maggette milsap okur tinsley jackson randolph / AK47 boozer biedrins |
|
|
Posted: Mon Mar 16, 2009 3:10 am
there's a reason, actually, there's lots of reasons, no one will go near him
|
|
 Hall of Famer
Posts: 21362
Joined: Thu Jul 21, 2005 7:50 am Location: Perth Poster Credit: 27 |
Posted: Mon Mar 16, 2009 3:30 am
It's Felton and then Hinrich in preference for me   migya make the ring fall on ya |
 All Star
Posts: 2869
Joined: Thu Jul 10, 2008 9:04 am Location: Sitting on the dock of the bay, watchin the warriors roll away Poster Credit: 2 |
Posted: Mon Mar 16, 2009 4:46 am
Hinrich than felton for me. don't think bob's will let felton go (restricted) for what we can throw at him... plus hinrich is a good defender, and a better shooter. |
Hall of Famer
Posts: 21362
Joined: Thu Jul 21, 2005 7:50 am Location: Perth Poster Credit: 27 |
Posted: Mon Mar 16, 2009 4:59 am
Hinrich certainly is a proven player and a good trade for Crawford, but Felton is a better passer, gets the steals and is younger, with very good upside. On the Warriors, Felton would do better, running and gunning and having more weapons to pass to. Getting Felton could be easier, though not sure now as he has been playing ahead of Augustin for a few weeks now, so maybe the Bobcats have reaslised he is the one to keep as starting PG migya make the ring fall on ya |
 Franchise Player
Posts: 7512
Joined: Thu Dec 30, 2004 2:44 pm Location: Brighton, England. Poster Credit: -5 |
Posted: Mon Mar 16, 2009 5:32 am
|
bigstrads's Website
|
Posted: Mon Mar 16, 2009 6:13 am
wow wtf happened to this board.
Basketball would be depressing without the warriors
|
|
 Franchise Player
Posts: 6145
Joined: Thu Mar 08, 2007 10:13 am Location: looking down at the Warriors practice facility Poster Credit: -7 |
Posted: Mon Mar 16, 2009 7:44 am
Tinsley? Seriously?
I can not in good concience leave this in such a high view area. Moving this to the trades forum! _____________________________________________________
http://WWW.GOLDENSTATEWARRIORS-RT.COM |
All Star
Posts: 3317
Joined: Fri Apr 06, 2007 2:33 pm Location: the STACK Poster Credit: 0 |
Posted: Mon Mar 16, 2009 10:18 am
i was talking about getting tinsley this past summer. big guard with good midrange and distributing ability. but once i brought it up people convinced me that he is a cancer and ive yet to go back into wanting him on our team. dude cant even hang in indiana (who is happy with the likes of dunleavy)...that says a lot. and from what i remember, someone said that jackson mentioned tinsley was the one who instigated the brawl in detroit. had that happened in oakland all hell would break loose.
"the victorious warrior wins first, and then goes to war; the defeated warrior goes to war first, and hopes to win."- The Art of War
 |
 All Star
Posts: 2334
Joined: Wed Jan 09, 2008 12:33 pm Poster Credit: 0 |
Posted: Mon Mar 16, 2009 2:14 pm
Um...there's a big difference between Jack and Tinsley. While fans may have had a negative image of Jack, NO ONE in the NBA ever disliked him, including the Pacer's GM at the time. He traded him because the fans essentially forced him to, not because he wanted to (he has said this many many times). Jack was never a cancer. Tinsley is a mess.  |
 Franchise Player
Posts: 9202
Joined: Mon Aug 14, 2006 11:07 pm Location: Land of the Lacob. Poster Credit: 0 |
Posted: Mon Mar 16, 2009 2:44 pm
True, but Tinsley? No way. That guy is GREAT for like a week, then he's good for two, then he's decent for the rest.
Don't hate yourself in the morning... sleep 'til noon.
|
 All Star
Posts: 1758
Joined: Tue Nov 04, 2008 11:49 am Location: napa Poster Credit: 2 
|
Posted: Mon Mar 16, 2009 2:48 pm
I definitely would not want an inconsistent Tinsley after having an entire season off. Im sure he has not been working hard over the past year and a half since he took the floor.
|
|
Franchise Player
Posts: 6145
Joined: Thu Mar 08, 2007 10:13 am Location: looking down at the Warriors practice facility Poster Credit: -7 |
Posted: Mon Mar 16, 2009 2:49 pm
and to add to Capt's post.... Tinsley is not even any good. I would not trade for him if he was a saint of all saints.... the guy cant play! _____________________________________________________
http://WWW.GOLDENSTATEWARRIORS-RT.COM |
All Star
Posts: 2869
Joined: Thu Jul 10, 2008 9:04 am Location: Sitting on the dock of the bay, watchin the warriors roll away Poster Credit: 2 |
Posted: Tue Mar 17, 2009 1:11 am
common y'all, really?
|
17 posts
• Page 1 of 2 • 1, 2
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Yahoo [Bot] and 1 guest
The team
Delete all board cookies• All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ]Powered by phpBB© 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group