On a trade for KG again

Discuss any moves or trades here, real, rumored, made up, you name it!

Moderators: Mr. Crackerz, JREED, Guybrush, hobbes

User avatar
Hall of Famer
Posts: 21379
Joined: Thu Jul 21, 2005 7:50 am
Location: Perth
Poster Credit: 27
PostPosted: Sun Dec 11, 2005 2:52 am
If the Warriors seriously wanted KG, now could be a real possibility! Since Artest wants out of the Pacers, a 3 team trade could be engineered.

Possibility:
Warriors - Murphy or Diogu, Dunleavy, Taft or Foyle or Fisher
Pacers - Artest and Croshere or Granger or Tinsley
TWolves - Garnett

Result:
Warriors - Garnett
Pacers - Dunleavy and Taft or Foyle or Fisher
TWolves - Artest and Croshere or Granger or Tinsley


Just another idea to get KG


Wouldn't be surprised if the Knicks threw everyone they on their team right now have into landing both Artest and KG
Image



Image


migya make the ring fall on ya
User avatar
Hall of Famer
Posts: 18461
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:48 am
Location: Somewhere in this site...
Poster Credit: -4
PostPosted: Sun Dec 11, 2005 3:09 am
So Indy would get the worst players on our roster for Artest so we can grab KG?. I don't get it...

And, instead of going for KG, why not make the trade for Artest?, sf is our most glaring need...
User avatar
Hall of Famer
Posts: 21379
Joined: Thu Jul 21, 2005 7:50 am
Location: Perth
Poster Credit: 27
PostPosted: Sun Dec 11, 2005 3:41 am
I don't think Murphy or Diogu (not to mention some of the others I included) are the worst on our roster........

Artest has attitude problems and is not as good as KG. Also, Bird would want alot for Artest, while McHale might just want to get a trade over and done with, as long as it is alright. KG is better hands down
Image



Image


migya make the ring fall on ya
User avatar
Hall of Famer
Posts: 18461
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:48 am
Location: Somewhere in this site...
Poster Credit: -4
PostPosted: Sun Dec 11, 2005 5:33 am
migya wrote:I don't think Murphy or Diogu (not to mention some of the others I included) are the worst on our roster........


Yeah, but the others are. What I mean is that in that trade, you're not giving up any of our stars, Indy is not getting equal value. Murph or Diogu are there just to tease them into that trade.

And, btw, why wouldn't Indy make that trade straight for KG?. I mean, Artest for KG + fillers. Why get the Warriors involved when they're not giving enough for either one?.
User avatar
Hall of Famer
Posts: 21379
Joined: Thu Jul 21, 2005 7:50 am
Location: Perth
Poster Credit: 27
PostPosted: Sun Dec 11, 2005 8:07 am
After the shock of Artest wanting out, the Pacers will be looking to get rid of him and get at least a capable PG and, if they can, a Center as well. They have Stephen Jackson and Granger who can play SF, so they will not be needing in that position. SG can be filled easily
Image



Image


migya make the ring fall on ya
User avatar
Hall of Famer
Posts: 13528
Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2005 10:03 pm
Location: Golden State
Poster Credit: 52
PostPosted: Sun Dec 11, 2005 11:02 pm
Oh God, not this again... I'm sitting this one out. The "Garnett-Trade-Thread-Of-The-Week" has been created again...
Image
GOLDEN STATE WARRIORS DIE HARD
Image
Image

Return to Trades

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron