xbay wrote:GSW United wrote:aletha33 wrote:GSW United wrote:kidd are not as good as nash on making every players around him a better offensive players.
Look at Nets and Suns....because of nash the sun became an elite team while kidd are still 'don't know where'.
Sun is the super offensive team while W's on the second place but last year we are about as same as they are....
not quite sure what you're trying to say, but yes, let's look at the Nets and Suns...
Nets, back to back finals appearance...
Suns, zero final appearances.
as you were saying?
i am not saying the past...coz i am not the person living in the past.
what i say just put this 2 teams on the game now..SUNS and Nets..who win will win the title...that's it.
The reality is simple who win is the king.
Nash hasn't even tasted the NBA Finals, Kidd has. If it wasn't for the Shaq era with the Lakers, they would've won the title... or at least had a better shot against the Spurs. Nash is built to run an offense, same with Kidd. Kidd is better all-around. Double-doubles? or Triple-doubles? The list goes on.
Watching Kidd with the Suns and Nets was simply entertaining and amazing. You'd have to see it to actually get a real, true perspective on it.
back to back championships final but didn't win...that's mean nothing.
nash are more complete sport player...he can really good on soccer.
Kidd is good on tripple double but if can't help your team win the championship title, it's meaningless...
look at Tom Brady how superior he is in the season but if u didn't win the Superbowl is nothing.
And i do think the personal life Nash are more simple than Kidd...i don't want to say Kidd we all know that.
Sorry if i am wrong...
for me Nash is better than kidd. If not because of that incident 2 years ago, Sun probably win that championships already.