RSS
Chat
FAQ
knick trades
Moderators: Mr. Crackerz, JREED, Guybrush, hobbes
38 posts
• Page 1 of 3 • 1, 2, 3
Role Player
Posts: 230
Joined: Mon Aug 01, 2005 12:12 pm Location: SAN FRAN Poster Credit: 0 |
 Posted: Sun Nov 13, 2005 2:45 pm
hey guys..it looks like new york is going to start looking to trade soon...especially steph...would you guys trade and who would you trade for? i personally think we don't have room for anyone on the knicks as is...but i wanna hear your thoughts
|
dstown's Profile
 Hall of Famer
Posts: 18461
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:48 am Location: Somewhere in this site... Poster Credit: -3 |
Posted: Sun Nov 13, 2005 2:50 pm
I'd trade for Steph, I'd even give them a... bag of fries.
No, really, there's no one in the Knicks I'd like to have in this team. Well, maybe Ariza, if they don't ask for too much... |
 All Star
Posts: 1266
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 7:50 pm Location: Alameda Poster Credit: 0 |
Posted: Sun Nov 13, 2005 3:11 pm
Yeah, the only players I would want from the Knicks are the only two that they want to keep: Ariza and Curry. Everyone else is no help towards winning a championship.
|
Role Player
Posts: 230
Joined: Mon Aug 01, 2005 12:12 pm Location: SAN FRAN Poster Credit: 0 |
Posted: Sun Nov 13, 2005 3:58 pm
since taft is doing so well and foyle isn't cutting it...three way trade for steve francis, steph and foyle. we get francis, orlando gets steph, and new york gets foyle....nice....hahaha...j/k
|
|
Posted: Sun Nov 13, 2005 5:18 pm
Id take David Lee......that is all
|
|
Role Player
Posts: 230
Joined: Mon Aug 01, 2005 12:12 pm Location: SAN FRAN Poster Credit: 0 |
Posted: Sun Nov 13, 2005 5:20 pm
nate robinson for miles?
|
 Hall of Famer
Posts: 12984
Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2005 10:03 pm Location: Golden State Poster Credit: 41 |
Posted: Sun Nov 13, 2005 5:54 pm
Ugh, distusging! The Knicks players would only hinder our team! I wouldn't even pick up Stephon if given the opportunity to do so for draft picks! Bad trade ideas!
 GOLDEN STATE WARRIORS DIE HARD   |
Hall of Famer
Posts: 18461
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:48 am Location: Somewhere in this site... Poster Credit: -3 |
Posted: Mon Nov 14, 2005 3:49 am
I know this was a joke, but I wouldn't want Francis close to my team. I'd rather have Rick Brunson... |
 Hall of Famer
Posts: 20894
Joined: Thu Jul 21, 2005 7:50 am Location: Perth Poster Credit: 21 |
Posted: Mon Nov 14, 2005 6:24 am
Nate Robinson for Fisher!!!!!! I know some of you will luv this trade and why wouldn't you - Nate is an up and coming rookie who looks so promising and the Fish is still decent but overpaid and getting older. He is good for the positive influence though.
Nate Robinson would be like an Earl Boykins off the bench! He would only get better as well. He and Ellis can fight it out for back up honours. Both would get better quicker as well. Then one could be traded along with another good player in a couple of years if need be   migya make the ring fall on ya |
Hall of Famer
Posts: 18461
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:48 am Location: Somewhere in this site... Poster Credit: -3 |
Posted: Mon Nov 14, 2005 6:40 am
I don't know about Nate, I haven't seen him play enough, just the games against the Warriors and some highlights. I don't know if he can be an effective pg. As a change of pace, yeah, but who says Ellis won't be able to do so...
|
Hall of Famer
Posts: 20894
Joined: Thu Jul 21, 2005 7:50 am Location: Perth Poster Credit: 21 |
Posted: Mon Nov 14, 2005 7:12 am
I just think that Nate is the only Knick worth considering. I was just giving an answer to the thread
migya make the ring fall on ya |
Hall of Famer
Posts: 12984
Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2005 10:03 pm Location: Golden State Poster Credit: 41 |
Posted: Mon Nov 14, 2005 8:54 am
I disagree... I don't think ANY Knick is worth a trade.
GOLDEN STATE WARRIORS DIE HARD |
Hall of Famer
Posts: 20894
Joined: Thu Jul 21, 2005 7:50 am Location: Perth Poster Credit: 21 |
Posted: Tue Nov 15, 2005 6:16 am
Nate Robinson just seems to have such potential that getting him would be such an investment. the Knicks seem to have a number of guards ahead of him so he won't have much of a chance there
migya make the ring fall on ya |
Hall of Famer
Posts: 18461
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:48 am Location: Somewhere in this site... Poster Credit: -3 |
Posted: Tue Nov 15, 2005 8:33 am
I don't think they'd be willing to trade Nate right now. The way I see it, the untradable players (if it's not a deal too good to pass up) in the Knicks roster are Nate, Lee, Curry, Ariza and Frye.
|
Hall of Famer
Posts: 12984
Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2005 10:03 pm Location: Golden State Poster Credit: 41 |
Posted: Tue Nov 15, 2005 10:22 am
I'd agree with that list. The Knicks may seem like it, but they aren't stupid. They know they need to dump some contracts because (aside from Marbury), they're paying for a team of all-stars and getting nothing in return for players like Jamal Crawford, Quentin Richardson, and Penny Hardaway. They'd be willing to negotiate about any of THOSE players, but their young ones are probably not for sale.
GOLDEN STATE WARRIORS DIE HARD |
38 posts
• Page 1 of 3 • 1, 2, 3
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests
The team
Delete all board cookies• All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ]Powered by phpBB© 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group