knick trades

Discuss any moves or trades here, real, rumored, made up, you name it!

Moderators: Mr. Crackerz, JREED, Guybrush, hobbes


Role Player
Posts: 230
Joined: Mon Aug 01, 2005 12:12 pm
Location: SAN FRAN
Poster Credit: 0
PostPosted: Sun Nov 13, 2005 2:45 pm
hey guys..it looks like new york is going to start looking to trade soon...especially steph...would you guys trade and who would you trade for? i personally think we don't have room for anyone on the knicks as is...but i wanna hear your thoughts
User avatar
Hall of Famer
Posts: 18461
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:48 am
Location: Somewhere in this site...
Poster Credit: -4
PostPosted: Sun Nov 13, 2005 2:50 pm
I'd trade for Steph, I'd even give them a... bag of fries.

No, really, there's no one in the Knicks I'd like to have in this team. Well, maybe Ariza, if they don't ask for too much...
User avatar
All Star
Posts: 1266
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 7:50 pm
Location: Alameda
Poster Credit: 0
PostPosted: Sun Nov 13, 2005 3:11 pm
Yeah, the only players I would want from the Knicks are the only two that they want to keep: Ariza and Curry. Everyone else is no help towards winning a championship.

Role Player
Posts: 230
Joined: Mon Aug 01, 2005 12:12 pm
Location: SAN FRAN
Poster Credit: 0
PostPosted: Sun Nov 13, 2005 3:58 pm
since taft is doing so well and foyle isn't cutting it...three way trade for steve francis, steph and foyle. we get francis, orlando gets steph, and new york gets foyle....nice....hahaha...j/k
User avatar
All Star
Posts: 3244
Joined: Wed Oct 05, 2005 6:29 am
Poster Credit: 0
PostPosted: Sun Nov 13, 2005 5:18 pm
Id take David Lee......that is all
uptempo wrote:Dude, why are you so obsessed with Mullin?

Role Player
Posts: 230
Joined: Mon Aug 01, 2005 12:12 pm
Location: SAN FRAN
Poster Credit: 0
PostPosted: Sun Nov 13, 2005 5:20 pm
nate robinson for miles?
User avatar
Hall of Famer
Posts: 13539
Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2005 10:03 pm
Location: Golden State
Poster Credit: 53
PostPosted: Sun Nov 13, 2005 5:54 pm
Ugh, distusging! The Knicks players would only hinder our team! I wouldn't even pick up Stephon if given the opportunity to do so for draft picks! Bad trade ideas!
Image
GOLDEN STATE WARRIORS DIE HARD
Image
Image
User avatar
Hall of Famer
Posts: 18461
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:48 am
Location: Somewhere in this site...
Poster Credit: -4
PostPosted: Mon Nov 14, 2005 3:49 am
dstown wrote:since taft is doing so well and foyle isn't cutting it...three way trade for steve francis, steph and foyle. we get francis, orlando gets steph, and new york gets foyle....nice....hahaha...j/k


I know this was a joke, but I wouldn't want Francis close to my team. I'd rather have Rick Brunson...
User avatar
Hall of Famer
Posts: 21413
Joined: Thu Jul 21, 2005 7:50 am
Location: Perth
Poster Credit: 28
PostPosted: Mon Nov 14, 2005 6:24 am
Nate Robinson for Fisher!!!!!! I know some of you will luv this trade and why wouldn't you - Nate is an up and coming rookie who looks so promising and the Fish is still decent but overpaid and getting older. He is good for the positive influence though.

Nate Robinson would be like an Earl Boykins off the bench! He would only get better as well. He and Ellis can fight it out for back up honours. Both would get better quicker as well. Then one could be traded along with another good player in a couple of years if need be
Image



Image


migya make the ring fall on ya
User avatar
Hall of Famer
Posts: 18461
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:48 am
Location: Somewhere in this site...
Poster Credit: -4
PostPosted: Mon Nov 14, 2005 6:40 am
I don't know about Nate, I haven't seen him play enough, just the games against the Warriors and some highlights. I don't know if he can be an effective pg. As a change of pace, yeah, but who says Ellis won't be able to do so...
User avatar
Hall of Famer
Posts: 21413
Joined: Thu Jul 21, 2005 7:50 am
Location: Perth
Poster Credit: 28
PostPosted: Mon Nov 14, 2005 7:12 am
I just think that Nate is the only Knick worth considering. I was just giving an answer to the thread
Image



Image


migya make the ring fall on ya
User avatar
Hall of Famer
Posts: 13539
Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2005 10:03 pm
Location: Golden State
Poster Credit: 53
PostPosted: Mon Nov 14, 2005 8:54 am
I disagree... I don't think ANY Knick is worth a trade.
Image
GOLDEN STATE WARRIORS DIE HARD
Image
Image
User avatar
Hall of Famer
Posts: 21413
Joined: Thu Jul 21, 2005 7:50 am
Location: Perth
Poster Credit: 28
PostPosted: Tue Nov 15, 2005 6:16 am
Nate Robinson just seems to have such potential that getting him would be such an investment. the Knicks seem to have a number of guards ahead of him so he won't have much of a chance there
Image



Image


migya make the ring fall on ya
User avatar
Hall of Famer
Posts: 18461
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:48 am
Location: Somewhere in this site...
Poster Credit: -4
PostPosted: Tue Nov 15, 2005 8:33 am
I don't think they'd be willing to trade Nate right now. The way I see it, the untradable players (if it's not a deal too good to pass up) in the Knicks roster are Nate, Lee, Curry, Ariza and Frye.
User avatar
Hall of Famer
Posts: 13539
Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2005 10:03 pm
Location: Golden State
Poster Credit: 53
PostPosted: Tue Nov 15, 2005 10:22 am
I'd agree with that list. The Knicks may seem like it, but they aren't stupid. They know they need to dump some contracts because (aside from Marbury), they're paying for a team of all-stars and getting nothing in return for players like Jamal Crawford, Quentin Richardson, and Penny Hardaway. They'd be willing to negotiate about any of THOSE players, but their young ones are probably not for sale.
Image
GOLDEN STATE WARRIORS DIE HARD
Image
Image
Next

Return to Trades

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest