War Years wrote:If we could know that Brand is recovered, I would also do that trade in a minute. We would become one of the NBA's 5 elite teams.
I didn't say it in my post but, obviously, me too. That would allow us to have one of the top starting fives in the league... albeit with no bench.
War Years wrote:But what I don't understand is: Are we necessarily obligated to compensate a team that loses a player who chooses to opt out of his contract?
How does that work?
Well, Brand makes around $16 million per year. We can't sign him to such a big deal unless Baron opts out, and even then, we still would have to sign Monta and Beans to extensions.
Which means our only chance to add him would be via sign-and-trade, and we have to compensate the Clips accordingly. In players and money. The trade I posted, and maybe one or two future picks, would be a great deal for them... if Brand doesn't want to stay a Clipper anymore, that is.
War Years wrote:I know we'd have to free some contract room. It would be very convenient if we could offer some of that to the Clippers. If not, I'm sure someone would want Harrington, for example.
Not possible at this point. Well, not really. I guess we could try to trade one of our big contracts (basically, Al) to a team so much under the cap that they could trade us a scrub making less money and take the rest of Al's contract using their available cap room... but no team with enough cap room will want to add Al. There will be better free agents available.
Any trade with other teams would free up cap room, at best, for the 2009-2010 season.