bigstrads wrote:Second, Mig's insinuation certainly isnt "LIGHT HEARTED" ie: that Obama is the son and Malcolm X and has been engineered and placed in goverment by the financial elite of America............I dont see that as "LIGHT HEARTED" and I didnt see any smilies or real explanation of his point anywhere, thats all pretty serious stuff to me when not explained that it isnt.
It wasn't supposed to be something to be in terms of a joke, I was serious in showing that there is great physical similarities between the two, but it also wasn't supposed to be something to cause heated arguments or get someone's blood to boil and for those that do, LIGHTEN UP.
bigstrads wrote:As far as my posts............why is that I can do 50 "LIGHT HEARTED" posts on all manner of subjects all over this board but as soon as I excercise my ability to speak on a tough subject, one that I have gained alot of knowledge and understanding on (I do not speak on things that I dont know about, because whats the point? my opinion wouldnt be very valid if I didnt actually know what I was talking about) I am then called a drama queen and someone whos looking for an argument.
You seem like you have alot of knowledge about Malcolm X and/or the African American movement of some fifty or so years ago, I have to admit I do not have that much knowledge on the subject. I do however, know that many people that are or consider themsleves knowledgeable on certain subjects only know the OFFICIAL STORY of things and on that particular subject and don't know the real truth on things, the things that went on behind the scenes, in other words the REAL TRUTH. As an example, there are still many people that are considered very knowledgeable on the subject of the U.S. Federal Reserve (who I have covered a bit in a couple of other threads). Those people think that the financial and economic problems of the United States are not caused by the Federal Reserve and that in fact the Federal Reserve has nothing to do with it but actually are trting to help the situation. Then you have people, that are not seen as radical or conspiracy followers, like Senator Ron Paul, who have said on many occassions that the Federal Reserve is the ONLY ONES RESPONSIBLE for the financial and economic problems the U.S. is experiencing.
My point is that (and I don't know because again, I haven't researched into it) the real true story behind Malcolm X could be quite the opposite of the positive one that is the official story. I don't know, I am ignorant on the subject,however it wouldn't surprise me, because every major movement, that I have researched, has been created and funded by the elite that I have spoken of. Any non supported movement by a number of members of the population, is almost always stopped before it gets big enough and media coverage is blacked out real quick, as to stop any further expansion of that movement.
As for Barrack Obama - As I've said before, he may have some sort of charisma, but that means NOTHING and it is clear and basic research shows, that he is a servant of the global (evil) elite and has been even before he was president, just like almost all the priks in positions of power
bigstrads wrote:Mig's words = "Worthy of dicussion"............so I put my point across...........just because it was filled with my passion and knowledge for and of the subject, and because I feel that Mig has slipped slightly of the edge of sanity recently with his constant "facts" regarding all manner of conspiracys.
You can think what you want, I don't take it to heart and really it is your right and your business what you think of me, and others for that matter.
As for insanity, ha, that's a nice one. It also depends on anyone's definition of that word. Just because I read deeply into things, keep my eyes and ears open for information, doesn't make me anything, let alone insane, though that's exactly what the "bad guys" that control things want and that's exactly what the average shmo does; judge people heavily and negatively if they think outside the box.
bigstrads wrote:Why not just answer and rebuff what I said, tell me Im wrong, try and back up what is being said and implied with something valid.............cuz again, all this thread is the ridiculous notion that Obama is Malcolm's son and that that would be a bad thing (that was my big disagreement and what got my back up, that being Malcolm X's son would somehow be a bad thing?)
As I've said, there are similarities between the two men's appearance, to say the least. The story goes much further than just pictures, I've read a bit on it one day ago.
If you want to read further, be good if you do so you can then make a more informed evaluation on the topic, then do so.
The place where I read information is here:
http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/atlas_shrugs/2008/10/how-could-stanl.htmlWhat I have read states that Barrack Obama Sr. visited Hawaii (where the apparent "impregnation", ie. Suck and fuk, occurred) and had friends there and those friends never recall Barrack Obama Jr.'s mother (Stanley Ann Dunham) being there and certainly having seen her with Obama Sr. University of Washington records place Stanley Ann Dunham in Washington State in Aug 1961 so how could she be in Honolulu 2680 miles away birthing Barack the same month.
Read the information from the link I gave above, if you want to know the whole lot, I've only said a little bit here
bigstrads wrote:Anyway, if this feels like when I "campaigned" for Sf to not be here..............I dont give a sh*t...............if I wanted to say something about or too Migya regarding his status here, then I would say it.
I know you see me as the most intelligent member of this forum and I concur
RSS
Chat
FAQ
PAWNO's Profile
PAWNO's Website
Whoops sorry!
