D4rk 0ne wrote:
There is really not much evidence to suggest such a "theory" is even worth considering to be honest . . . There is some coincidental / circumstantial stuff that is extremely iffy. That's about it. I've yet to see anyone put together a decent argument to show why the US Government would destroy their own land, or how any supposed evidence suggests that they did so. And I've read a fair bit about it.
That is one of the theories that really annoys me, along with the Lunar landing. A good conspiracy theory (what an oxymoron
) requires some legitimate factual support. Neither of those theories have anything -- at least, nothing that hasn't been disproved or rebutted sufficiently in any discussion I've seen.
Off the top of my head, I can't think of any conspiracy theory that I really find interesting or believable. I'm sure if I spent enough time thinking/caring about them I could come up with something though...
Ahh, a challenge...............ok dude, all I ask is that you dont take this as a conspiracy theory, and try to think of it as a presentation of scientific fact, with no suggestion as to what I am implying by it but just simple questioning via looking at the official statements of what happend and what is physically possible in the know universe.............heres one Ive used before =
The melting point of steel is 1510C..........fact.
The melting point of iron is 1535C...........fact.
For both towers to collapse, the official explanation is that the jet fuel and other combustables like paper/wood/plastics etc, reached such a temperature that it melted the steel structure and caused the crash (as evident by the pools of molten steel/melted steel found in the ruins)
So, more facts...........the maximum temperature achievable by a fully oxygenated jet fuel induced fire is 825C........fact............see a problem?..........and given that black smoke was pouring from the building, this means that the fires were oxygen starved and as such were not able to even reach there max temp of 835C.............just under half the temperature needed to melt the steel structure.
Finally..........the maximum temperature achievable of C4 explosives is around 1800C..........also, as is widely suggested, thermite was most likely used as it is the quickest and easiest way to melt steel...........it has a low temp of around 1230C and a high temp of 4556C
In conclusions, it is IMPOSSIBLE!!! and never before happend in human/steel/fire history that a steel can be melted by jet fuel and other available combustables in the building...........simply not possible...........so what does that mean?
One final one, in case you talk about damage to the stucture from the impact............the fact that the building fell at the same rate as gravity (proven and timed), meaning that from the beginning of the collapse, the rest of buildings structure was pulverised and there was no resistance (the official explanation was that the crash area collapsed onto the other un-affected floors and the weight caused the rest of the collapse)............is IMPOSSIBLE, as it would not have fallen without resistance, and at the same rate as gravity, as each floor hitting the other would have expelled energy and slowed it down, possibly causing it to fall to the side.............the only way this IS POSSIBLE is with explosives/thermite planted through the structure.
One more little one on the impact of the plane causing structural damage..............there are numerous records of wind sheer being equal to and in many case, far greater than the impact created by the planes hitting the towers.
I have many more but I hope you read that for what it is...........not a mud sling at anyone, just simple questioning of the official explanation and how easy they are to dis-prove with a few simple scientific facts.
I have more.