migya wrote:EMan32 wrote:migya wrote:tHe_pEsTiLeNcE wrote:TMC wrote:EMan32 wrote:even in a friendly league...a stacked team takes all the fun out of it
Yeah, but it's like in real life. If both sides agree to it, why not?. It's different if there's something else on the line. In that case, it can be considered a fraud... but if not, I assume both sides of the trade want to improve.
I kind of agree with eman here. I know from seasons where I used to do fantasy hoops that one thing I'd always do at the beginning of seasons was make shitloads of trade offers and try to fleece the newbies. Uninformed people being allowed to trade can take the fun out of it.
You have to respect everyone's free will to make their own decisions. It's like not allowing a trade to happen in the nba because a few teams think it's unfair. A crock
yeah but say it was a maxiell for amare trade. everyone knows its unfair but theres no one to veto it. now the person in 1st place who drafted a good team and made fair trades/ FA acquisitions will go to second place cuz some other guy who was probably 1 game away from making the playoffs moves into first place due to an unfair trade. when you take away competetion you take away the fun.
There have been some lopsided trades in nba history! What, does David Stern now have the right to veto the trade and reject it! No!
im sayin tho...this is supposed to be for fun...what fun is it when someone takes all the fun out of it? if this was the NBA id have no problem with any of the trades. as long as the contracts/money works out, it is what it is. iono...just my opinion