RSS
Chat
FAQ
mista240sx's Profile
if the warriors dont get artest or kurt thomas they can still try this one.
http://games.espn.go.com/nba/features/t ... &te=&cash=
with this trade the warriors get a better shooter/rebounder in miller and a solid sf/pf in warrick and a solid back up point guard in lowry.
harrington
pietrus
o'bryant
2nd rd pick(if they ask for a 1st rd pick hell ya give it)
mike miller
warrick
lowry
davis/lowry/watson
jackson/ellis/azu
miller/barnes/belinelli
webber/wright/warrick
biedrins/perovic/croshere
results
stronger starting lineup
stronger bench
i think we can make a run with this lineup remember the dubs have the best record in the west ever since jack came back with this lineup the warriors improve and can make a serious run in the playoffs.
Al Harrington
PTS: 14.6 REB: 5.3 AST: 1.5 PER: 16.08
Mike Miller
PTS: 17.0 REB: 6.6 AST: 3.7 PER: 15.93
if we dont get artest/kurt thomas we can still try this....
Moderators: Mr. Crackerz, JREED, Guybrush, hobbes
27 posts
• Page 1 of 2 • 1, 2
 Role Player
Posts: 428
Joined: Sat Jan 05, 2008 12:37 am Location: fresno ca Poster Credit: 0 
|
 Posted: Sun Feb 10, 2008 1:43 pm
Last edited by mista240sx on Sun Feb 10, 2008 2:13 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Clifford Rozier rememer him?
 |
 Hall of Famer
Posts: 18461
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:48 am Location: Somewhere in this site... Poster Credit: -3 |
Posted: Sun Feb 10, 2008 1:51 pm
Considering how poorly Webber has played so far, I'd rather wait before trading Al Harrington... (because Nellie doesn't have any kind of confidence on Wright)
|
All Star
Posts: 3317
Joined: Fri Apr 06, 2007 2:33 pm Location: the STACK Poster Credit: 0 |
Posted: Sun Feb 10, 2008 1:54 pm
i guess this would mean that you have mike miller playing PF ala Dirk. i dont think id do it...harrington isnt a rebounding beast, but miller isnt much a rebounder period.
"the victorious warrior wins first, and then goes to war; the defeated warrior goes to war first, and hopes to win."- The Art of War
 |
Role Player
Posts: 428
Joined: Sat Jan 05, 2008 12:37 am Location: fresno ca Poster Credit: 0
|
Posted: Sun Feb 10, 2008 2:01 pm
in my opinion miller is more consistent than harrington and lowry would run the point better when bd is resting seems like when watson is on the floor it gets pretty sloppy and well we all we would rather have warrick over pietrus.
Last edited by mista240sx on Sun Feb 10, 2008 2:29 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Clifford Rozier rememer him?
|
All Star
Posts: 3317
Joined: Fri Apr 06, 2007 2:33 pm Location: the STACK Poster Credit: 0 |
Posted: Sun Feb 10, 2008 2:17 pm
miller IS more consistent than harrington. im not gonna argue that. the thing is, you'd be taking miller out of his natural position. i dont know that he's ever played PF, expecially against the other PFs in the league. he would be a huge liability on defense against bigger teams. more so than harrington "the victorious warrior wins first, and then goes to war; the defeated warrior goes to war first, and hopes to win."- The Art of War
|
Role Player
Posts: 428
Joined: Sat Jan 05, 2008 12:37 am Location: fresno ca Poster Credit: 0
|
Posted: Sun Feb 10, 2008 2:28 pm
thats the reason why hakim warrick is in this trade and brandon wright is on the roster if this trade did happen if brandon wright and hakim warrick gotten fair share minutes the dubs will have less problems defensive and offensive as far as the front line goes. Clifford Rozier rememer him?
|
All Star
Posts: 3317
Joined: Fri Apr 06, 2007 2:33 pm Location: the STACK Poster Credit: 0 |
Posted: Sun Feb 10, 2008 2:31 pm
then you would have either jackson or miller coming off the bench? neither is a bench player right now. theres no reason miller shouldnt be starting...he would start anywhere he goes. wright and warrick wouldnt do anything to solve that. "the victorious warrior wins first, and then goes to war; the defeated warrior goes to war first, and hopes to win."- The Art of War
|
Role Player
Posts: 428
Joined: Sat Jan 05, 2008 12:37 am Location: fresno ca Poster Credit: 0
|
Posted: Sun Feb 10, 2008 2:45 pm
start miller at small forward
wright and warrick his backups this is nelie ball those three can play 3-4-5 spots but yeah miller would start at the 3 spot for sure. Clifford Rozier rememer him?
|
All Star
Posts: 3317
Joined: Fri Apr 06, 2007 2:33 pm Location: the STACK Poster Credit: 0 |
Posted: Sun Feb 10, 2008 2:48 pm
so who goes to the bench? jackson or monta? both of whom, again, shouldnt come off the bench
"the victorious warrior wins first, and then goes to war; the defeated warrior goes to war first, and hopes to win."- The Art of War
|
Role Player
Posts: 428
Joined: Sat Jan 05, 2008 12:37 am Location: fresno ca Poster Credit: 0
|
Posted: Sun Feb 10, 2008 3:31 pm
here you go davis/lowry jackson/ellis miller/barnes wright/warrick biedrins/webber watson bellineli croshere perovic webber can play 4-5 wright-4-5 warrick 3-4 but yeah the answer to your question ellis comming off the bench thats the reason why i said with this trade a stronger starting lineup stronger bench. Clifford Rozier rememer him?
|
All Star
Posts: 3317
Joined: Fri Apr 06, 2007 2:33 pm Location: the STACK Poster Credit: 0 |
Posted: Sun Feb 10, 2008 4:30 pm
i disagree. stronger bench, yeah, definitely. but stronger starting lineup? not so sure about that. id rather have monta and harrington in the starting lineup than miller and warrick. but of course thats my opinion. not like i would make the trade anyway "the victorious warrior wins first, and then goes to war; the defeated warrior goes to war first, and hopes to win."- The Art of War
|
 Franchise Player
Posts: 6145
Joined: Thu Mar 08, 2007 10:13 am Location: looking down at the Warriors practice facility Poster Credit: -7 |
Posted: Sun Feb 10, 2008 4:53 pm
To me this is a perception thing.... Mike Miller is known as a SHOOTER, but yet his FG and 3pt %'s are virtually identical over the past two years. Miller also can't defend C's or have NEARLY the versatility as Harrington.
Then you add it the fact that Miller is a turnover machine and there is no comparison betweent the two. _____________________________________________________
http://WWW.GOLDENSTATEWARRIORS-RT.COM |
bada's Website
Role Player
Posts: 428
Joined: Sat Jan 05, 2008 12:37 am Location: fresno ca Poster Credit: 0
|
Posted: Sun Feb 10, 2008 7:12 pm
i respect you guys opinion you know i got mine remember also we need a pg that can run the team while bd is resting i think lowry can do better than watson at this point and without this trade we cant have that.
Clifford Rozier rememer him?
|
Role Player
Posts: 428
Joined: Sat Jan 05, 2008 12:37 am Location: fresno ca Poster Credit: 0
|
Posted: Sun Feb 10, 2008 7:21 pm
here is this better?
http://games.espn.go.com/nba/features/t ... &te=&cash= pietrus o'bryant 2nd rd pick for warrick lowry Clifford Rozier rememer him?
|
 All Star
Posts: 3086
Joined: Fri Jul 21, 2006 9:51 pm Location: Redwood City, CA Poster Credit: 0 |
Posted: Sun Feb 10, 2008 7:25 pm
Why would they do that? Why would teams want Pietrus?
|
27 posts
• Page 1 of 2 • 1, 2
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest
The team
Delete all board cookies• All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ]Powered by phpBB© 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group