RSS
Chat
FAQ
Barnes frustrated with lack of offers
Moderators: Mr. Crackerz, JREED, Guybrush, hobbes
23 posts
• Page 2 of 2 • 1, 2
 Franchise Player
Posts: 9202
Joined: Mon Aug 14, 2006 11:07 pm Location: Land of the Lacob. Poster Credit: 0 |
 Posted: Thu Jul 19, 2007 9:53 pm
Yeah. If I were any team looking at Matt, I'd pay for only one year. He's not worth the risk.
Don't hate yourself in the morning... sleep 'til noon.
|
xbay's Profile
 Franchise Player
Posts: 5756
Joined: Mon Jul 02, 2007 5:40 am Location: On the couch watching sports Poster Credit: 0 |
Posted: Thu Jul 19, 2007 9:57 pm
If they sign him to a two-three year deal and he turns out to be a bust, you are stuck with him for three-four million a year. One year is alright because if he turns out to be a bust, you can get rid of him. I hope that is what the Warriors do. If he did the same this year as he did last year, that is the situation where they can give him a multiyear deal. |
Franchise Player
Posts: 9202
Joined: Mon Aug 14, 2006 11:07 pm Location: Land of the Lacob. Poster Credit: 0 |
Posted: Fri Jul 20, 2007 12:27 am
Exactly. If the Warriors are going to spend the full MLE on Barnes, it better be only for a year. If Mullin is offering him 2-3 mil, I don't mind a multiyear deal. Nothing more, anything less. 
Don't hate yourself in the morning... sleep 'til noon.
|
 Hall of Famer
Posts: 18461
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:48 am Location: Somewhere in this site... Poster Credit: -4 |
Posted: Fri Jul 20, 2007 2:13 am
We're not gonna pay him the full MLE. That's too much for a player that has only one good season in his career. And as a backup, to make matters worse.
I'd say our limit is around 3 or 3.5 million, not more. |
 Hall of Famer
Posts: 21366
Joined: Thu Jul 21, 2005 7:50 am Location: Perth Poster Credit: 27 |
Posted: Fri Jul 20, 2007 9:08 am
Barnes at 3 million a year for three years is ideal because you don't want him leaving or demanding much more money if he repeats what he did last season in only a one year deal   migya make the ring fall on ya |
Franchise Player
Posts: 5756
Joined: Mon Jul 02, 2007 5:40 am Location: On the couch watching sports Poster Credit: 0 |
Posted: Fri Jul 20, 2007 10:16 am
But what happens if we give him a full time starting job, and he busts and averages 6-3-1. He will be a bench warmer the rest of his time here. I would say three years with a team option after the first year. |
 All Star
Posts: 1266
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 7:50 pm Location: Alameda Poster Credit: 0 |
Posted: Fri Jul 20, 2007 12:09 pm
There is no way he is going to sign a 1 year contract coming off a career year. Migya had it right with 3 mil for 3 years and I would add a player and team option for year four (where they both had to agree on it). That way he gets financial security and W's don't committ too much for too long. As trite as it is, 3 mil isn't that much in the NBA, considering teams are paying players 5 times that amount to not play for them.
|
Hall of Famer
Posts: 21366
Joined: Thu Jul 21, 2005 7:50 am Location: Perth Poster Credit: 27 |
Posted: Fri Jul 20, 2007 8:05 pm
Yea, three years isn't exactly a long time to commit to a player, especially at three milion a year only. Even if Barnes does become a pretty useless player, it is only three years and he can get stuck deep down the bench and Mullin can still sign another player for a similar amount migya make the ring fall on ya |
23 posts
• Page 2 of 2 • 1, 2
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest
The team
Delete all board cookies• All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ]Powered by phpBB© 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group