Jermaine Wants Lakers But Trade Talks Stall

Area for news articles related to the Warriors

Moderators: Mr. Crackerz, JREED, Guybrush, hobbes

User avatar
Hall of Famer
Posts: 21376
Joined: Thu Jul 21, 2005 7:50 am
Location: Perth
Poster Credit: 27
PostPosted: Sun Jun 24, 2007 6:40 pm
Reason why Lakers wouldn't trade for Kidd is because he is aging and only has some 2 years left. Reason why they wouldn't trade for Artest is because he is a proven headcase as he has showed yet again. Jermaine is much more of a sure thing and a superstar
Image



Image


migya make the ring fall on ya
User avatar
Hall of Famer
Posts: 18461
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:48 am
Location: Somewhere in this site...
Poster Credit: -4
PostPosted: Mon Jun 25, 2007 12:33 am
I also think Jermaine if their best bet. Not sure it's going to happen, tho, but that's their only option right now. And they'll have to part ways with Bynum to get him. There's no other way.



Still, if I had to bet, I'd do it for this trade not happening.
User avatar
Hall of Famer
Posts: 21376
Joined: Thu Jul 21, 2005 7:50 am
Location: Perth
Poster Credit: 27
PostPosted: Mon Jun 25, 2007 2:28 am
I don't think it will happen either, as Kobe has demanded a trade really. Bynum is nothing yet and is no sure thing to be any good either so if they have a real chance of doing this trade, they need to sell it to Kobe so they get back to being contenders
Image



Image


migya make the ring fall on ya
User avatar
Hall of Famer
Posts: 13525
Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2005 10:03 pm
Location: Golden State
Poster Credit: 52
PostPosted: Tue Jun 26, 2007 2:06 pm
migya wrote:Reason why Lakers wouldn't trade for Kidd is because he is aging and only has some 2 years left. Reason why they wouldn't trade for Artest is because he is a proven headcase as he has showed yet again. Jermaine is much more of a sure thing and a superstar

Jermaine is an injury/suspension risk at all times.

Jason Kidd would be far more of a sure thing... at least, for the next 2 or 3 years. Jermaine is a headcase, too. Not as dramatic as Artest, but he's still a headcase
Image
GOLDEN STATE WARRIORS DIE HARD
Image
Image
User avatar
Hall of Famer
Posts: 21376
Joined: Thu Jul 21, 2005 7:50 am
Location: Perth
Poster Credit: 27
PostPosted: Wed Jun 27, 2007 1:45 am
32 wrote:
migya wrote:Reason why Lakers wouldn't trade for Kidd is because he is aging and only has some 2 years left. Reason why they wouldn't trade for Artest is because he is a proven headcase as he has showed yet again. Jermaine is much more of a sure thing and a superstar

Jermaine is an injury/suspension risk at all times.

Jason Kidd would be far more of a sure thing... at least, for the next 2 or 3 years. Jermaine is a headcase, too. Not as dramatic as Artest, but he's still a headcase



Jermaine is not a player that is frequently suspended, Lakers would be better with him than they are now, relying on health ofcourse.

Kidd is currently 34 years old! He will start his decline very soon
Image



Image


migya make the ring fall on ya
Previous

Return to News Articles

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron