Game Thread: Oklahoma City Thunder @ Warriors 2009-01-21

Talk about the upcoming Warriors game here

Moderators: Mr. Crackerz, JREED, Guybrush, 32

Will the Warriors spank the Thunder?

Poll ended at Wed Jan 21, 2009 4:19 pm

69%
YES
11
31%
NO
5

Total votes: 16


Rookie
Posts: 143
» Wed Jan 21, 2009 11:28 pm
......

Role Player
Posts: 243
» Wed Jan 21, 2009 11:29 pm
And had Jack not been Jack and bitched to the reffs, the thunder would have one less point................how much did we lose by again? oh that captain jack.... :roll:
User avatar

Rookie
Posts: 75
» Wed Jan 21, 2009 11:29 pm
JayPat wrote:Didn't call bank, count the basket off. :mrgreen: :banghead:

That made the loss a little bit easier to live with :)

Rookie
Posts: 171
» Wed Jan 21, 2009 11:36 pm
the thunder were not dunder....

that maggette jam on durant's head was a beauty though. :)

and it did seem like the dubs were destined to lose this one. i saw way to much 1 on 1 from jack and jamal. limited ball movement. almost no fast break points and way too much half court.

and maggette seems to be the second coming of barkley lately. he's a force when he puts his mind to it.

turiaf also played well, despite no help inside.

Rookie
Posts: 101
» Wed Jan 21, 2009 11:58 pm
-kurz has no business starting, but isn't a bad player. He is defensively and fundamentally sound, hes just not athletic or have much potential. However, if you can play team offense and defense, and hit open shots, you can be a NBA bench player.
-omg CJ wipe the sweat off your hands lol that ball slipped right out..
-jamal has a nice clutch floater
-jamal needs to rotate on D sooner, he left green wide open for the win.
-Agree with above, too much iso playing in the end. that's the problem sometimes with having 3 ( soon to be 4) guys that want the ball in their hands when the game is on the line. 1 does an iso, misses, the next one takes a turn.. sometimes they make it, some times they don't, and thats how you get a .500 team.
User avatar

All Star
Posts: 3074
» Thu Jan 22, 2009 12:00 am
Some of our issues surfaced tonight, but those positives from the past few games were there as well, mainly Maggette being a heavily positive factor off the bench. If either:

A) Crawford was on
B) Biedrins played

...we would have won without problem, IMO.
User avatar

All Star
Posts: 3242
» Thu Jan 22, 2009 12:48 am
JayPat wrote:Some of our issues surfaced tonight, but those positives from the past few games were there as well, mainly Maggette being a heavily positive factor off the bench. If either:

A) Crawford was on
B) Biedrins played

...we would have won without problem, IMO.


yes but, he wasn't and he didn't. End of story

Rookie
Posts: 143
» Thu Jan 22, 2009 1:08 am
JayPat wrote:Some of our issues surfaced tonight, but those positives from the past few games were there as well, mainly Maggette being a heavily positive factor off the bench. If either:

A) Crawford was on
B) Biedrins played

...we would have won without problem, IMO.


you have to remember we were nearly perfect at the foul line as well.
User avatar

All Star
Posts: 3074
» Thu Jan 22, 2009 1:26 am
True true. It's hard to win though when you have your anchor out, and Biedrins is our consistent anchor. Obviously we could have played better and won.
User avatar

Franchise Player
Posts: 7481
» Thu Jan 22, 2009 3:25 am
Yawn.

Rookie
Posts: 84
» Thu Jan 22, 2009 5:46 am
Green had too easy of a shot, no D on him & who was just watching CRAWFORD.
User avatar

Hall of Famer
Posts: 21908
» Thu Jan 22, 2009 8:08 am
Another loss, getting better at getting a top 5 pick :wink:
User avatar

All Star
Posts: 3040
» Thu Jan 22, 2009 12:45 pm
migya wrote:Another loss, getting better at getting a top 5 pick :wink:

It is looking that way, for sure...

Rookie
Posts: 143
» Thu Jan 22, 2009 2:02 pm
migya wrote:Another loss, getting better at getting a top 5 pick :wink:


I suppose so... :|
User avatar

Rookie
Posts: 75
» Thu Jan 22, 2009 3:23 pm
Overall, it was a good game. The W's shot well from the line and simply got out-sized in the rebounding department. Crawford's drive/layup at the end was clutch and Green's shot luckily banked in. It was a tough loss but all the people hating on the W's play need to take a look at the stat line again as well as individual performances from craw/maggette.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests