coltraning wrote:

bigstrads wrote:

coltraning wrote:

bigstrads wrote:Once again, I cannot get excited or be happy about a win where Randolph gets Nelson's old wrinkly one shoved up his ass for no reason............that one little baffling, stupid detail just spoils it for me.

Makes no sense why he wouldnt play a single moment in the second half, when AS USUAL!!! we play our best basketball when he and another BIG MAN are in there.

I hear you, bro...really do, made no sense at all, except as some kind of sadistic mind ****. There was absolutely NOTHING more Randolph could have done last night...his brilliant 9 minutes were the absolute photo negative of Rob Kurz going -14 in plus minus in 5 Minutes the previous night. Randolph was shafted tonight. However, it WAS a terrific game, and I am loving the Ws ball movement lately. Your man, Crawford did have a monster game. Azu is playing terrifically well lately, and Turiaf has started showing a nice 16-18 footer to go along with the rest of his good game. I am astonished, have to say, at what a TRULY terrible touch Biedrins has, and that is a shame, since he is moving beautifully, and can outquick just about any other center to the rim...problem is, he then blows about 1/2 of his 2 foot layups.

I was going to say Crawford looked like he had a great game, with a great percentages and a nice all around floor game..............but I was just consumed with my anger over the treatment of Randolph............again.

So, now Ive calmed down............Crawford looks like he played superbly, and from the highlights...........he won us the game in more ways than one.

(Colt, Ill always give credit where credit is due man. .........and this isnt the first time Ive praised Crawford, infact, I have praised him more than I have grumbled about him)

I know, Bigs...it was very tongue in cheek. Unlike those who suck on a lemon, and gasp "he had a pretty good game" when he was ranked third in the entire NBA as a game performer last night, or even more amazingly, still call him a chucker (what, do they work for the McCain campaign, and are so invested in their spin, and are out of a job?). You are showing a pretty balanced view. If you have watched the games since sjax went out, it is astonishing how much better the ball movement has been. There is movement, cutting, nice back doors, great drive and kicks. I know Nelson is a stubborn mofo, but I think it would be a disaster to start sjax when he returns.

coltraning wrote:

"Always" Next wrote:

martin wrote:bad highlights from the game -
maggette playing soccer and kicking the ball all over the place.
crawford chucking (contested low percentage, the same as his game winning one) shots all over,50 percent of which, magically, went down. bad decisions all over with him. and it's rather an exception from a rule that they made him actually MAKE something.
bellinelli hitting the rim from 3 point land over and over untill he makes one go through and bam, fricking injury and no warriors players except two white ones(biedrins and kurz) comming to look what's happenning. speak of team-mates and body language here.
biedrins not managing to finish at the rim, it's getting tiresome to watch.

good ones -
cj steal from dunleavy and two made foul shots near the end (thought he might get nervous).
bellinelli - some nice drives with circus finishes.
crawford - two fouls against on the 3 point mark. how ridiculous is that becoming to look like? the best skill he possesses and'll ever posses.
randolph - nice hustle overall.
kelena - the best player yesterday, working like a swiss watch.

Martin,
it sounds like you did watch this game, how can you still have something bad to say about how Crawford played? He has missed tons of 3s this year on great looks that just didnt stay down. He took over the game last night in the 4th quarter and definitely won that game. He has an uncanny knack for drawing that foul on the 3pt attempt and he can get to the rim whenever he wants. He also has great court awareness is a really good passer. Biedrins has cost Crawford tons of assists this year because he cant finish at the rim. If Marco or Morrow were playing like Crawford everybody would be nuthuggin on them like nobodies business....but when its Crawford he still gets little respect.

yup...nothing to add to that, bro...it is a Bush-style fit the facts to the policy approach and not worth trying to reason with. You know as well as I, that any reasonable person watching the game last night would say Crawford was superb last night.

martin wrote:

coltraning wrote:

"Always" Next wrote:

martin wrote:bad highlights from the game -
maggette playing soccer and kicking the ball all over the place.
crawford chucking (contested low percentage, the same as his game winning one) shots all over,50 percent of which, magically, went down. bad decisions all over with him. and it's rather an exception from a rule that they made him actually MAKE something.
bellinelli hitting the rim from 3 point land over and over untill he makes one go through and bam, fricking injury and no warriors players except two white ones(biedrins and kurz) comming to look what's happenning. speak of team-mates and body language here.
biedrins not managing to finish at the rim, it's getting tiresome to watch.

good ones -
cj steal from dunleavy and two made foul shots near the end (thought he might get nervous).
bellinelli - some nice drives with circus finishes.
crawford - two fouls against on the 3 point mark. how ridiculous is that becoming to look like? the best skill he possesses and'll ever posses.
randolph - nice hustle overall.
kelena - the best player yesterday, working like a swiss watch.

Martin,
it sounds like you did watch this game, how can you still have something bad to say about how Crawford played? He has missed tons of 3s this year on great looks that just didnt stay down. He took over the game last night in the 4th quarter and definitely won that game. He has an uncanny knack for drawing that foul on the 3pt attempt and he can get to the rim whenever he wants. He also has great court awareness is a really good passer. Biedrins has cost Crawford tons of assists this year because he cant finish at the rim. If Marco or Morrow were playing like Crawford everybody would be nuthuggin on them like nobodies business....but when its Crawford he still gets little respect.

yup...nothing to add to that, bro...it is a Bush-style fit the facts to the policy approach and not worth trying to reason with. You know as well as I, that any reasonable person watching the game last night would say Crawford was superb last night.

coltraning is at his best again, using his bullshit wrong argumentation over and over. man, get a fricking logic course (it is nice to use bad logic, that makes me feel as if i said something really GROZZ). it seems you've missed something. appart from not being able to get yourself mannned-up and admit when you are wrong, you are coming with completely stupid argumentative technique. gosh, i'm gonna throw up....

i said 50 percent of his shots (mainly contested shots and the ones he usually misses) went in, so it does make him look good if you put your atttention on his mades. but not so much, if you see him taking ill-shots, that are not good ones. the fact that he made the last shot only means it was a luck, for the shot was over the hands after usuall crawford dribble fiesta. wow, we got lucky, crawford got lucky!
luck is not a measuring tool of bball goodness.

now, get off me with your twisted brainfucking policies of argumentation.

RobDIKUM wrote:

martin wrote:

coltraning wrote:

"Always" Next wrote:

martin wrote:bad highlights from the game -
maggette playing soccer and kicking the ball all over the place.
crawford chucking (contested low percentage, the same as his game winning one) shots all over,50 percent of which, magically, went down. bad decisions all over with him. and it's rather an exception from a rule that they made him actually MAKE something.
bellinelli hitting the rim from 3 point land over and over untill he makes one go through and bam, fricking injury and no warriors players except two white ones(biedrins and kurz) comming to look what's happenning. speak of team-mates and body language here.
biedrins not managing to finish at the rim, it's getting tiresome to watch.

good ones -
cj steal from dunleavy and two made foul shots near the end (thought he might get nervous).
bellinelli - some nice drives with circus finishes.
crawford - two fouls against on the 3 point mark. how ridiculous is that becoming to look like? the best skill he possesses and'll ever posses.
randolph - nice hustle overall.
kelena - the best player yesterday, working like a swiss watch.

Martin,
it sounds like you did watch this game, how can you still have something bad to say about how Crawford played? He has missed tons of 3s this year on great looks that just didnt stay down. He took over the game last night in the 4th quarter and definitely won that game. He has an uncanny knack for drawing that foul on the 3pt attempt and he can get to the rim whenever he wants. He also has great court awareness is a really good passer. Biedrins has cost Crawford tons of assists this year because he cant finish at the rim. If Marco or Morrow were playing like Crawford everybody would be nuthuggin on them like nobodies business....but when its Crawford he still gets little respect.

yup...nothing to add to that, bro...it is a Bush-style fit the facts to the policy approach and not worth trying to reason with. You know as well as I, that any reasonable person watching the game last night would say Crawford was superb last night.

coltraning is at his best again, using his bullshit wrong argumentation over and over. man, get a fricking logic course (it is nice to use bad logic, that makes me feel as if i said something really GROZZ). it seems you've missed something. appart from not being able to get yourself mannned-up and admit when you are wrong, you are coming with completely stupid argumentative technique. gosh, i'm gonna throw up....

i said 50 percent of his shots (mainly contested shots and the ones he usually misses) went in, so it does make him look good if you put your atttention on his mades. but not so much, if you see him taking ill-shots, that are not good ones. the fact that he made the last shot only means it was a luck, for the shot was over the hands after usuall crawford dribble fiesta. wow, we got lucky, crawford got lucky!
luck is not a measuring tool of bball goodness.

now, get off me with your twisted brainfucking policies of argumentation.

let's not continue that back and forth from the other thread, PLEASE! by the way, luck or skill, crawford played well, and making 50% of those shots is a good percentage don't you think? I know what you are saying, but guys have good nights and bad nights, crawford had a good one. I bet it probably just makes us as fans cringe thinking him having a night like that will make him want to continue chucking away. But i'll give him credit when he does well.

32 wrote:good to see hesitant, back-handed, meager credit given to Crawford from his nemesis miggy on a night where he single-handedly silver-plattered us a victory. Jamal Crawford carried us with a 32 points game (15 in the 4th quarter) including the game-winning 3-pointer. Yeah. He had an okay game.

martin wrote:

RobDIKUM wrote:

martin wrote:

coltraning wrote:

"Always" Next wrote:

martin wrote:bad highlights from the game -
maggette playing soccer and kicking the ball all over the place.
crawford chucking (contested low percentage, the same as his game winning one) shots all over,50 percent of which, magically, went down. bad decisions all over with him. and it's rather an exception from a rule that they made him actually MAKE something.
bellinelli hitting the rim from 3 point land over and over untill he makes one go through and bam, fricking injury and no warriors players except two white ones(biedrins and kurz) comming to look what's happenning. speak of team-mates and body language here.
biedrins not managing to finish at the rim, it's getting tiresome to watch.

good ones -
cj steal from dunleavy and two made foul shots near the end (thought he might get nervous).
bellinelli - some nice drives with circus finishes.
crawford - two fouls against on the 3 point mark. how ridiculous is that becoming to look like? the best skill he possesses and'll ever posses.
randolph - nice hustle overall.
kelena - the best player yesterday, working like a swiss watch.

Martin,
it sounds like you did watch this game, how can you still have something bad to say about how Crawford played? He has missed tons of 3s this year on great looks that just didnt stay down. He took over the game last night in the 4th quarter and definitely won that game. He has an uncanny knack for drawing that foul on the 3pt attempt and he can get to the rim whenever he wants. He also has great court awareness is a really good passer. Biedrins has cost Crawford tons of assists this year because he cant finish at the rim. If Marco or Morrow were playing like Crawford everybody would be nuthuggin on them like nobodies business....but when its Crawford he still gets little respect.

yup...nothing to add to that, bro...it is a Bush-style fit the facts to the policy approach and not worth trying to reason with. You know as well as I, that any reasonable person watching the game last night would say Crawford was superb last night.

coltraning is at his best again, using his bullshit wrong argumentation over and over. man, get a fricking logic course (it is nice to use bad logic, that makes me feel as if i said something really GROZZ). it seems you've missed something. appart from not being able to get yourself mannned-up and admit when you are wrong, you are coming with completely stupid argumentative technique. gosh, i'm gonna throw up....

i said 50 percent of his shots (mainly contested shots and the ones he usually misses) went in, so it does make him look good if you put your atttention on his mades. but not so much, if you see him taking ill-shots, that are not good ones. the fact that he made the last shot only means it was a luck, for the shot was over the hands after usuall crawford dribble fiesta. wow, we got lucky, crawford got lucky!
luck is not a measuring tool of bball goodness.

now, get off me with your twisted brainfucking policies of argumentation.

let's not continue that back and forth from the other thread, PLEASE! by the way, luck or skill, crawford played well, and making 50% of those shots is a good percentage don't you think? I know what you are saying, but guys have good nights and bad nights, crawford had a good one. I bet it probably just makes us as fans cringe thinking him having a night like that will make him want to continue chucking away. But i'll give him credit when he does well.

please ask the same mr. coltraning, for it's not me coming with 'bushlike' and 'exluding you from a reasonable man campus' types of argumentation. ok?
now, where did i say crawford had a bad night percentage wise? i completely agree that having 50 percent of shots down in the nba is a big success measuring number. that was not a part of the argument. it was his way doing it that made me do some critics.
now forget it, and move on.
i really have no energy to fight on internet forrums over some basketball players. i said what i thought when looking at the game. maybe i'm wrong. maybe crawford took good shots. maybe it's the way it should be with him.
just, don't come with insults (in a form of metaphorical implication), no matter how nicely they are masked, mr. coltraning.

migya wrote:

32 wrote:good to see hesitant, back-handed, meager credit given to Crawford from his nemesis miggy on a night where he single-handedly silver-plattered us a victory. Jamal Crawford carried us with a 32 points game (15 in the 4th quarter) including the game-winning 3-pointer. Yeah. He had an okay game.

That's just singling me out #32, no need to do that.

I said Crawford had a good game and so did many others. I trust the overall view point from the people on here, as most have not just taken the rosey outlook of the team's bad moves and performances

32 wrote:

migya wrote:

32 wrote:good to see hesitant, back-handed, meager credit given to Crawford from his nemesis miggy on a night where he single-handedly silver-plattered us a victory. Jamal Crawford carried us with a 32 points game (15 in the 4th quarter) including the game-winning 3-pointer. Yeah. He had an okay game.

That's just singling me out #32, no need to do that.

I said Crawford had a good game and so did many others. I trust the overall view point from the people on here, as most have not just taken the rosey outlook of the team's bad moves and performances

You are correct. I apologize, it was an unnecessary shot. My bad.

32 wrote:

migya wrote:

32 wrote:good to see hesitant, back-handed, meager credit given to Crawford from his nemesis miggy on a night where he single-handedly silver-plattered us a victory. Jamal Crawford carried us with a 32 points game (15 in the 4th quarter) including the game-winning 3-pointer. Yeah. He had an okay game.

That's just singling me out #32, no need to do that.

I said Crawford had a good game and so did many others. I trust the overall view point from the people on here, as most have not just taken the rosey outlook of the team's bad moves and performances

You are correct. I apologize, it was an unnecessary shot. My bad.