Page 1 of 2
Game Thread: Indiana Pacers @ Warriors 2006-01-05
Posted: Tue Jan 03, 2006 10:02 pm
Indiana Pacers (16-12) @ Golden State Warriors (17-15)
Start time 7:30 PM PST @ The Arena in Oakland
Probable starters for the Golden State Warriors
PG - Baron Davis
SG - Jason Richardson
SF - Mike Dunleavy
PF - Troy Murphy
C - Ike Diogu
Probable starters for the Indiana Pacers
PG - Jamaal Tinsley
SG - Sarunas Jasikevicius
SF - Stephen Jackson
PF - Jermaine O'Neal
C - Jeff Foster
PPG - J. Richardson (23.0) | J. O'Neal (22.3)
RPG - T. Murphy (8.6) | J. O'Neal (10.0)
APG - B. Davis (9.5) | J. Tinsley (5.4)
SPG - B. Davis (1.8 ) | R. Artest (2.6)
BPG - A. Foyle (1.7) | J. O'Neal (2.3)
Matchups this Season
Jan 5 - Indiana Pacers @ Golden State Warriors
Feb 10 - Golden State Warriors @ Indiana Pacers
Posted: Wed Jan 04, 2006 5:00 pm
I think the Ws will hopefully take this one. They need M.P. back bad but if the Pacers are without Tinsley and Baron rebounds after the bad game in Memphis we should have the adv.
W's by 3
Posted: Wed Jan 04, 2006 5:58 pm
Sarunas Jasikevicius is going to get punked. be it baron or j-rich, the dude will find out what nba basketball is all about. there cant be a repeat of the free-throw party that we saw pau gasol enjoying. o'neal needs to be boxed out at all times
Posted: Wed Jan 04, 2006 10:22 pm
Jermaine might not even play, he didn't today again. If so, the Warrors by 15 to 20! I think this could be the first truly thrashing win the Warriors have had! Baron has no good defender on him, likewise JRich, Murphy should get all the shots he wants and the Pacers don't have many scorers without Tinsley and O'neal.
Warriors by 15 - 20!
Posted: Thu Jan 05, 2006 5:23 am
migya wrote:the Pacers don't have many scorers without Tinsley and O'neal.
But they're still a really good defensive team. And they have enough scorers in their backcourt to stay in the game. That gives them a chance to win.
Not a guaranteed win
Posted: Thu Jan 05, 2006 1:57 pm
Yeah, don't count out the Pacers. Like the Spurs, Pistons, Jazz, and Grizzlies, they are very fundamentally sound, which is exactly the kind of team that gives the W's trouble. I love the Warriors and I'm happy they're doing well and finally have some talent on the team, but a fundamentally sound team they are not.
Posted: Thu Jan 05, 2006 4:29 pm
pacers are without oneal, and without tinsley. if warriors lose this, i think it'll be one of our most disappointing loses yet.
i just can't wait till after the game to see what's up with all these damn trade rumors.
Posted: Thu Jan 05, 2006 7:43 pm
Golden State 95
We'll probably end up playing sloppy, knowing us, but we'll win almost for sure.
Posted: Thu Jan 05, 2006 8:48 pm
WOOOORD!!! 1st post on this board.... loooong time fan.
Lets do this tonight!!
Warriors bounce back tonight, win by 8.
Posted: Thu Jan 05, 2006 9:37 pm
WTF is wrong with this team tonight 34-14 in the 1st QTR With NO JERMAINE O'NEIL!!
Anyone here think they are out of it becasue of the possible trade? This is pathetic...
Posted: Thu Jan 05, 2006 9:53 pm
Man trade Murphey he is doing nothing ...
WE NEED ARTEST
Posted: Thu Jan 05, 2006 9:54 pm
THIS IS EMBARRASING !!!
DOWN 20 POINTS TO INDIANA
Without their 3 of their starters
Posted: Thu Jan 05, 2006 10:02 pm
Down by 15 point ...
It will be a miracle if Warriors win
Posted: Thu Jan 05, 2006 10:13 pm
dammit...we better not lose twice on national television....warriors need to come out hard in the second half...
Posted: Thu Jan 05, 2006 10:41 pm
if we can get the lead down to 6 points for the last quarter i think we can win