Game Thread: Milwaukee Bucks @ Warriors 2013-03-09

Talk about the upcoming Warriors game here

Moderators: Mr. Crackerz, JREED, Guybrush, 32


All Star
Posts: 1189
» Fri Mar 08, 2013 11:13 pm
Milwaukee Bucks (30 - 29) @ Golden State Warriors (35 - 28)

Start time: 7:30 PM PST @ Oracle Arena
Local TV: CSN Bay Area
Nat TV: None

Probable starters for the Golden State Warriors:
ImageImageImageImageImage
C - Andrew Bogut
PF - David Lee
SF - Harrison Barnes
SG - Klay Thompson
PG - Stephen Curry

Probable starters for the Milwaukee Bucks:
ImageImageImageImageImage
C - Larry Sanders
PF - Luc Richard Mbah a Moute
SF - Ersan Ilyasova
SG - Monta Ellis
PG - Brandon Jennings

Team leaders:
PPG - S. Curry (22.1) | M. Ellis (18.8)
RPG - D. Lee (11.3) | L. Sanders (9.1)
APG - S. Curry (6.7) | B. Jennings (6.6)
SPG - S. Curry (1.7) | M. Ellis (2.0)
BPG - A. Bogut (1.6) | L. Sanders (3.2)

All Star
Posts: 2320
» Sat Mar 09, 2013 7:45 pm
no Lee.
barring something out of the ordinary, a loss.
User avatar

All Star
Posts: 3618
» Sat Mar 09, 2013 8:24 pm
martin wrote:no Lee.
barring something out of the ordinary, a loss.


Fishsticks...
User avatar

Moderator
Posts: 13751
» Sat Mar 09, 2013 8:34 pm
Better hope Bogut sews up the inside.

Because the team's biggest weakness all year has been allowing huge nights from perimeter players. And Ellis - whom nobody here gives any credit to - is coming with a vendetta.

All Star
Posts: 1352
» Sat Mar 09, 2013 8:45 pm
I'd be worried about Ellis and Jennings if they didn't suck.

I am worried about Ilyasova and Sanders.

Edit: And Redick.

All Star
Posts: 2320
» Sat Mar 09, 2013 8:51 pm
no ilyasova tonight.

bogut wants this game. good.
and klay doing good against monta. good.
so far, very fluent offense.

All Star
Posts: 1352
» Sat Mar 09, 2013 8:53 pm
martin wrote:no ilyasova tonight.

bogut wants this game. good.
and klay doing good against monta. good.
so far, very fluent offense.


I didn't realize. I was wondering why I wasn't seeing him.

All Star
Posts: 2320
» Sat Mar 09, 2013 9:00 pm
i just hope no 4 scoreless players on the court at the same time. jack needs to have big game with landry in starting 5, he is only one on the bench with scoring ability, maybe jefferrson will have some good minutes. and of course we will need easy points from second unit - try to run more.

All Star
Posts: 2320
» Sat Mar 09, 2013 9:02 pm
now is a major stretch with this unit.

All Star
Posts: 1352
» Sat Mar 09, 2013 9:11 pm
Does anyone else think Jefferson deserves more minutes? He looks very far removed from the awful stretch to the season and when he plays he looks very productive.

All Star
Posts: 2320
» Sat Mar 09, 2013 9:15 pm
Blackfoot wrote:Does anyone else think Jefferson deserves more minutes? He looks very far removed from the awful stretch to the season and when he plays he looks very productive.

yes, i do, i think he is more effective than barnes to be honest.

All Star
Posts: 2320
» Sat Mar 09, 2013 9:18 pm
ellis beastin, good to get him in foul trouble to limit his minutes and defense

All Star
Posts: 1352
» Sat Mar 09, 2013 9:28 pm
martin wrote:ellis beastin, good to get him in foul trouble to limit his minutes and defense


Yeah, I am certain if you take out his god awful stretch of Richy J shooting 15 percent from 3's, he probably is more effective than Barnes. I'd like to see Richard in for 20 minutes a game.

All Star
Posts: 2320
» Sat Mar 09, 2013 9:31 pm
landry stepping up big time, nice.
User avatar

Moderator
Posts: 13751
» Sat Mar 09, 2013 9:42 pm
Blackfoot wrote:I'd be worried about Ellis and Jennings if they didn't suck.

See, you say that... And then they get to halftime with 14 and 13, respectively. Which is more than any one Warrior.

And Golden State's single point lead came with 7 minutes of Ellis-free 2nd quarter ball.

I understand Ellis and Jennings put up poor advanced stats, but as bad as you believe they are, the perimeter defense of Curry, Jack, Thompson, and Barnes is even worse. Yet another night where the Warriors are poised to surrender 30 points to a wing player (maybe 2). Sigh... We should have swooped Iggy/Gay when we had the chance

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests