Page 3 of 146

Posted: Fri Apr 18, 2008 6:04 pm
by JOEL
sfsfsfgiants wrote:
JOEL wrote:i just read from the bleacher report...(i would post the link but i do not have those skills)that the pats traded moss back to the raiders for the raiders first pick..i am looking now to see if i can confirm this...has anyone heard this news?


I HIGHLY doubt that this happened. No way that the Raiders would want him back.



yeah me too.... i did read a quote from davis saying we might have the best combo in qb/wr russell / moss....

the best i can tell is this that belicheck is offering this trade to to the raiders and that davis is thinking it over ?

Posted: Fri Apr 18, 2008 6:54 pm
by GSW United
JOEL wrote:
sfsfsfgiants wrote:
JOEL wrote:i just read from the bleacher report...(i would post the link but i do not have those skills)that the pats traded moss back to the raiders for the raiders first pick..i am looking now to see if i can confirm this...has anyone heard this news?


I HIGHLY doubt that this happened. No way that the Raiders would want him back.



yeah me too.... i did read a quote from davis saying we might have the best combo in qb/wr russell / moss....

the best i can tell is this that belicheck is offering this trade to to the raiders and that davis is thinking it over ?



Like Nellie said " U DUMB BASTRAD"

Posted: Fri Apr 18, 2008 7:55 pm
by JOEL
who will the raiders pick my take mc fadden ray ratto from sf chronicle thinks if te raiders pick mcfadden he would trade him...i dont see that mr davis always likes the offensive play maker

Posted: Fri Apr 18, 2008 9:34 pm
by GSW United
JOEL wrote:who will the raiders pick my take mc fadden ray ratto from sf chronicle thinks if te raiders pick mcfadden he would trade him...i dont see that mr davis always likes the offensive play maker


Nope...we'll keep him...and we will dump jordan and rhodes for trade bait....
Probably Raiders will use mc fadden as a receiver instead of Running back...OR they use new system Double Dragon Running Back...
Mcfadden and Fargas go out at the same time and create some confusement for opponent and running 99.99 yard touchdown...

Posted: Sat Apr 19, 2008 1:40 pm
by JOEL
GSW United wrote:
JOEL wrote:who will the raiders pick my take mc fadden ray ratto from sf chronicle thinks if te raiders pick mcfadden he would trade him...i dont see that mr davis always likes the offensive play maker


Nope...we'll keep him...and we will dump jordan and rhodes for trade bait....
Probably Raiders will use mc fadden as a receiver instead of Running back...OR they use new system Double Dragon Running Back...
Mcfadden and Fargas go out at the same time and create some confusement for opponent and running 99.99 yard touchdown...



double dragon nice thats a new one :mrgreen:
ummm i could see getting rid of jordan he has not played and we hold his rights but who would want him and what wouldwe get for him?

can wait to see the double dragon :mrgreen:

Posted: Sat Apr 19, 2008 1:50 pm
by sfsfsfgiants
JOEL wrote:double dragon nice thats a new one :mrgreen:
ummm i could see getting rid of jordan he has not played and we hold his rights but who would want him and what wouldwe get for him?


A team that really needs a back would pay for him. You could probably get a fourth or fifth round pick for him.

Posted: Sat Apr 19, 2008 8:02 pm
by d1mex
I wouldn't mind McFadden, even if we don't need him.

However, if Chris Long is available, we should take him. He has the Raider blood, he has the skill, and DL is a need.

The true test for Al will be:

If C. Long and D-Mac are available at 4...who does he choose????

Posted: Sat Apr 19, 2008 8:35 pm
by JOEL
d1mex wrote:I wouldn't mind McFadden, even if we don't need him.

However, if Chris Long is available, we should take him. He has the Raider blood, he has the skill, and DL is a need.

The true test for Al will be:

If C. Long and D-Mac are available at 4...who does he choose????



davis will take long in a second

Posted: Sat Apr 19, 2008 8:36 pm
by JOEL
sfsfsfgiants wrote:
JOEL wrote:double dragon nice thats a new one :mrgreen:
ummm i could see getting rid of jordan he has not played and we hold his rights but who would want him and what wouldwe get for him?


A team that really needs a back would pay for him. You could probably get a fourth or fifth round pick for him.



yeah that sounds right... just what the raiders need a 4th or 5 th :mrgreen:

Posted: Sun Apr 20, 2008 2:21 am
by TMC
JOEL wrote:
d1mex wrote:I wouldn't mind McFadden, even if we don't need him.

However, if Chris Long is available, we should take him. He has the Raider blood, he has the skill, and DL is a need.

The true test for Al will be:

If C. Long and D-Mac are available at 4...who does he choose????



davis will take long in a second


Yep. It's between McFadden and Gholston that he may have doubts, but if Long is available, he'll be the pick.

Posted: Sun Apr 20, 2008 3:01 pm
by JOEL
TMC wrote:
JOEL wrote:
d1mex wrote:I wouldn't mind McFadden, even if we don't need him.

However, if Chris Long is available, we should take him. He has the Raider blood, he has the skill, and DL is a need.

The true test for Al will be:

If C. Long and D-Mac are available at 4...who does he choose????



davis will take long in a second


Yep. It's between McFadden and Gholston that he may have doubts, but if Long is available, he'll be the pick.


but long slipping to the 4th is a LONG shot :mrgreen:

Posted: Sun Apr 20, 2008 9:13 pm
by rsxracer
ohhh grrreat... a raider thread.

Posted: Sun Apr 20, 2008 9:21 pm
by sfsfsfgiants
Yeah, I know. Watch out for JOEL. All he does is talk Raiders. :roll: :wink:

Posted: Sun Apr 20, 2008 9:24 pm
by rsxracer
then it looks like we may not get along as well.

Posted: Sun Apr 20, 2008 9:28 pm
by sfsfsfgiants
Tell me about it. :roll:

Nah, I love JOEL. He is pretty cool. :wink: