RSS
Chat
FAQ
Someone explain this deal to me
Moderators: Mr. Crackerz, JREED, Guybrush, hobbes
4 posts
• Page 1 of 1
 Posted: Wed Jul 23, 2008 3:30 pm
Jason Hart for Brevin Knight, why the **** did the clippers do this? Knight is the superior player, they both have expiring contracts, and knight has a cheaper contract by 400,000 dollars. I kno this is such a small deal it just does not make any sense to me at all.
Basketball would be depressing without the warriors
|
|
jimbob631's Profile
 Franchise Player
Posts: 9202
Joined: Mon Aug 14, 2006 11:07 pm Location: Land of the Lacob. Poster Credit: 0 |
Posted: Wed Jul 23, 2008 4:10 pm
It's the Clippers, remember?
Don't hate yourself in the morning... sleep 'til noon.
|
 Franchise Player
Posts: 7512
Joined: Thu Dec 30, 2004 2:44 pm Location: Brighton, England. Poster Credit: -5 |
Posted: Wed Jul 23, 2008 5:25 pm
Yeah, looking at the numbers, theres no advantage for either team............except that one player is alot better than the other.
Maybe Baron said he wanted Brevin out..........ITS BARONS HOUSE NOW!!! 
|
bigstrads's Website
All Star
Posts: 3317
Joined: Fri Apr 06, 2007 2:33 pm Location: the STACK Poster Credit: 0 |
Posted: Wed Jul 23, 2008 6:33 pm
according to a couple posters in the warriors forum, brevin knight peaked in college 
Jason Hart is a bigger PG and younger than Knight. maybe they're hoping that Hart can learn from baron and help carry the team for the 1-2 years he's there after baron leaves. 
"the victorious warrior wins first, and then goes to war; the defeated warrior goes to war first, and hopes to win."- The Art of War
 |
4 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest
The team
Delete all board cookies• All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ]Powered by phpBB© 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group