Page 4 of 5

Posted: Sun Jun 27, 2010 7:40 pm
by f1n3
GoldenStJayhawk wrote:it's funny. You go on Philli boards and Iggy to them is what maggs was to us



If he were to come over here in a year people are going to be comparing him to S-Jax. The guy is ball dominant but has passing ability; he is not the greatest shooter and not much of a natural scorer. He does have more hustle than either Jax or Maggs though.

He's not perfect, but I'd take him over Jax and Maggs.

Quazza wrote:I'd take him for Monta, straight up, in a heart beat.


I think it's fair value, but Philly wouldn't do that deal. They have their Monta in Lou Williams.

Posted: Mon Jun 28, 2010 3:49 am
by E-Man
GoldenStJayhawk wrote:
Quazza wrote:it's funny. You go on Philli boards and Iggy to them is what maggs was to us


I'd take him for Monta, straight up, in a heart beat.


co-signed

Posted: Mon Jun 28, 2010 8:47 am
by LilBallerx8
GoldenStJayhawk wrote:
Quazza wrote:it's funny. You go on Philli boards and Iggy to them is what maggs was to us


I'd take him for Monta, straight up, in a heart beat.

They have Evan Turner dude. Their not trading for an SF. Iggy for Biedrins and Udoh? I never wanted to give up AR or Udoh, but...

Posted: Mon Jun 28, 2010 5:14 pm
by first off
monta for iggy

monta for granger

isn't happening

Posted: Mon Jun 28, 2010 5:24 pm
by GoldenStJayhawk
LilBallerx30 wrote:
GoldenStJayhawk wrote:I'd take him for Monta, straight up, in a heart beat.


They have Evan Turner dude. Their not trading for an SF.


Monta is a sf?

Posted: Mon Jun 28, 2010 5:32 pm
by Beast Mode
GoldenStJayhawk wrote:
LilBallerx30 wrote:
GoldenStJayhawk wrote:I'd take him for Monta, straight up, in a heart beat.


They have Evan Turner dude. Their not trading for an SF.


Monta is a sf?


Image

Posted: Mon Jun 28, 2010 7:17 pm
by xbay
GoldenStJayhawk wrote:
LilBallerx30 wrote:
GoldenStJayhawk wrote:I'd take him for Monta, straight up, in a heart beat.


They have Evan Turner dude. Their not trading for an SF.


Monta is a sf?


Yep.

Well, at least in Nelson's system he is.

Posted: Mon Jun 28, 2010 11:23 pm
by LilBallerx8
xbay wrote:
GoldenStJayhawk wrote:
LilBallerx30 wrote:
GoldenStJayhawk wrote:I'd take him for Monta, straight up, in a heart beat.


They have Evan Turner dude. Their not trading for an SF.


Monta is a sf?


Yep.

Well, at least in Nelson's system he is.

Before more people comment on this:

I meant SG :shock:

Posted: Tue Jun 29, 2010 9:33 am
by Chum
Here's an idea that's mostly about getting rid of Biedrins contract...

Biedrins - 9,000,000 (5 years)
Bell - 3,602,960 (3 years)
Radmanovic - 6,466,600 (2 years)

for

Kikilenko - 16,452,000 (2 years)
Price - 1,250,000 (2 years)

The only contract we'd have open after next season would be Monta's, and we'd get AK-47 for a season :)

Posted: Tue Jun 29, 2010 9:53 am
by LilBallerx8
Chum wrote:Here's an idea that's mostly about getting rid of Biedrins contract...

Biedrins - 9,000,000 (5 years)
Bell - 3,602,960 (3 years)
Radmanovic - 6,466,600 (2 years)

for

Kikilenko - 16,452,000 (2 years)
Price - 1,250,000 (2 years)

The only contract we'd have open after next season would be Monta's, and we'd get AK-47 for a season :)

HE EARNS 16MILLION?! whatdahell

Posted: Tue Jun 29, 2010 11:56 am
by Chum
LilBallerx30 wrote:
Chum wrote:Here's an idea that's mostly about getting rid of Biedrins contract...

Biedrins - 9,000,000 (5 years)
Bell - 3,602,960 (3 years)
Radmanovic - 6,466,600 (2 years)

for

Kikilenko - 16,452,000 (2 years)
Price - 1,250,000 (2 years)

The only contract we'd have open after next season would be Monta's, and we'd get AK-47 for a season :)

HE EARNS 16MILLION?! whatdahell


Kirilenko is a stud on offense and defense. I'd love it if he played out his remaining years with the Warriors. Besides, who'd make a better warrior than AK-47 :)

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EyjtsMSGj2w[/youtube]

Posted: Tue Jun 29, 2010 12:00 pm
by bada
Kirilenko is a stud of OFFENSE???? Come on Chum, you know better than that.

Posted: Tue Jun 29, 2010 12:03 pm
by Chum
bada wrote:Kirilenko is a stud of OFFENSE???? Come on Chum, you know better than that.


I'm taking his passing into account :)

What do you think of this trade though Bada?

Posted: Tue Jun 29, 2010 12:12 pm
by bada
Chum wrote:
bada wrote:Kirilenko is a stud of OFFENSE???? Come on Chum, you know better than that.


I'm taking his passing into account :)

What do you think of this trade though Bada?


I can't answer that objectively as I can not stand Kirilenko. I would puke if I saw him in a W's uni. Top 3 most hated current players for me and beyond that, I dont think he is even very good. He plays good defense but cant shoot and cant rebound ... everyone I talk to thinks he is way better than what I think so I am willing to admit that it could be that I dislike him so much that it warps my perception of him as a player but this would trade would be a HUGE blow to my Warriors "fandom"

Posted: Tue Jun 29, 2010 12:16 pm
by Beast Mode
Sorry, Kirilenko will never be a Warrior. Not because I'm not a fan of him, but because he get physically raped on national TV by Baron Davis. You can't sign up for the team that raped your relevance out of you.