migya wrote:He might just be the answer. Him or Biedrins - They both seem to have multiple skills, more than Foyle at least

Yeah, but they lack Foyle's experience and defensive skills. Let'em battle for the backup job. They need some more seasoning before taking over.

Um, I don't really know what to vote, he was a great sg, that made the wrong decision by signing with the pathetic Knicks and finished as an overpaid galloot....

Nah, he was just a shooter, a great one, tho. But weak in other aspects of his game. Not a real star, just a borderline all-star.

Who'd we get for him? The old man's not gonna part with Corey Maggette for his boy... even his dad's not THAT stupid... I don't think they have any player we may want. Last year was different, Wilcox was intriguing, but not anymore, with Diogu in the fold. And obviously, they aren't trading thier r...

Player32 wrote:He's done it before! Foyle can guard Shaq; he's proven it!

As long as he doesn't foul out...

16-20 right now?, no, but he'll be able to do it, with time. He's still a rookie, this season will be his first real contact with NBA basketball. Maybe in a couple of seasons.

BTW, I voted Deron. He'll have the chance to shine in the Jazz.

That's true, but it doesn't make it any better. I can understand not wanting to play for a team, like Jimmy Jackson or Baron did last year with the Hornets (I don't agree with it, but I can understand it). But playing and not giving max effort (what Carter did in Toronto), the team should have let h...

Yeah, true, but I don't like when a player quits on his team. He's getting paid to play, not to do as he wants... (And I'm not thinking of Baron right now, I'm going against Carter and the Raptors)

I know this is and old topic. I'll still do it tho:

Football: Bucs (Been a long time Derrick Brooks fan)
Basketball: Warriors
Soccer: FC Barcelona

And even with those numbers, the team finished strong. They need to improve the defense, but it's not as bad as it seems. Any run&gun team will give up a lot of points...

Obviously, I'd pick the better player, Baron that is. I'm only saying that an injury prone player is a risk. But if he's healthy we're better off with him, no doubt.

Don't get me wrong, I agree with you on Baron being slightly better than Arenas, but that doesn't help while in the injured list.

So Arenas wanted out of GS to play for a winner and he chooses the Wizards????? Arenas just went with the money, those comments doesn't mean anything. If the Warriors have had the cap to pay him, he would have stayed speaking about changing the culture of losing of the team and becoming winners and ...

You really believe we're better off with Baron than Arenas?

The last three season of Baron's career have been cut short with injuries. I'm crossing my fingers hoping it doesn't happen again...

And I don't think the gap between Arenas and Baron is that big...

First trade: Um, decent, I guess, You have two 4's playing inside, wouldn't work in real life, but great in the game, I suppose... Second trade: Great, Redd is way better than Murphy and Zarko. Only problem with those trades is the team is too thin at the bench. A couple of serious injuries and the ...

oh, last comment, what do you all think of Calbert Cheaney getting minutes? he went in pretty early too. last year he was injured so i don't count that, but i remember two years ago, and he has a REALLY good shot inside 15ft. we haven't even been talking about him possibly taking some valuable minu...